Eliot Posted March 1, 2014 Posted March 1, 2014 (edited) I've seen a lot of misconceptions about rule 11, the feedback rule, that should be addressed. As the later half of the rule currently reads, it does not state any price requirement for feedbacks to be left. It is allowed to receive feedback for a service, as long as the service was either paid or there was risk involved. An example for risk is doing a firecape service for someone, on an account that contains more then 1m. As we are aimed particularly at the RuneScape market, you are only allowed to give or receive feedback for graphics if there is at least $1 worth of goods (based off of common transfer rates) transacted. Feedback for free product will not be allowed. Right now, the rule reads that when doing services to receive feedback, it must be payed or a risk of 1M is involved. This is interpreted as 1gp is a payed service therefore no risk is required. There is no restriction in this rule on the amount of GP or IRL that must be traded for a feedback, meaning I could sell 1gp and receive a feedback. I don't think this is how the rule is meant to be so I think it could use a rewrite. Edited March 1, 2014 by Eliot
Zombies Posted March 1, 2014 Posted March 1, 2014 I've seen a lot of misconceptions about rule 11, the feedback rule, that should be addressed. As the later half of the rule currently reads, it does not state any price requirement for feedbacks to be left. Right now, the rule reads that when doing services to receive feedback, it must be payed or a risk of 1M is involved. This is interpreted as 1gp is a payed service therefore no risk is required. There is no restriction in this rule on the amount of GP or IRL that must be traded for a feedback, meaning I could sell 1gp and receive a feedback. I don't think this is how the rule is meant to be so I think it could use a rewrite. Agreed, sorry lomanden
Joe Posted March 1, 2014 Posted March 1, 2014 I fully agree, I had a conversation with @Raflesia and he said he would change it, guess he never got round to it.
Smart Posted March 1, 2014 Posted March 1, 2014 I'll work on this now and update you all here when I am finished. 1
Blue Posted March 1, 2014 Posted March 1, 2014 There should be a $1 value. I agree, otherwise feedback will be abused.
Eliot Posted March 1, 2014 Author Posted March 1, 2014 I'll work on this now and update you all here when I am finished. Sounds good, Smart.
twiztid4life Posted March 1, 2014 Posted March 1, 2014 I thought it was pretty straight forward for what it said, but its good to know that's not exactly what was intended.
Blue Posted March 2, 2014 Posted March 2, 2014 By the logic that 1gp should be feedback really puts the feedback system into abuse.
Blue Posted March 2, 2014 Posted March 2, 2014 when me and occazn raised for 100, we did 1xp power leveling for feedback, and sold herbz 1gp multiple times to multiple people Example of abuse 2
RoomScape Posted March 2, 2014 Posted March 2, 2014 when me and occazn raised for 100, we did 1xp power leveling for feedback, and sold herbz 1gp :P multiple times to multiple peopleHow in the hell is this even allowed? If you're serious, you should be ashamed to even say that, let alone have that member title saying first to 100 fb..., I'd delete your fb just for that if I were staff. -.- 1