5uck Posted October 13, 2013 Posted October 13, 2013 A committee to help interpret the rules\make final rulings in situations as we saw with rule #4 (Cortana Vs. People who re-posted her photos). Why is this needed? Would help provide closure to cases of importance and remove any "gray areas" of certain rules. Who should be on it? This group should be comprised current staff (global+) and admins. What would they do? As mentioned above, it would be there specific jobs to make final rulings on situations that touch upon the gray areas of the rules. They would perform a group vote/discuss how the rule should be interpreted/what punishment should be applied(if any). This would help avoid unfair/unjust bans as well as provide a much more solid understanding of the rules to the community. If a member of the "OsCourt" was involved in the case in question, they should not be allowed to vote, only to voice why they did what they did. Thoughts? Idea? Additions? Leave them below. 2
Solution Posted October 13, 2013 Posted October 13, 2013 and who would be on that team? the people mature/smart enough to be a mod, but those people will be mods.... nty
RSBadass Posted October 13, 2013 Posted October 13, 2013 ^ Seriously lol. If you think this website needs a supreme court you either have over 1000$ invested in this community OR your smoking some really good stuff bro.
GoldenGates Posted October 13, 2013 Posted October 13, 2013 (edited) I support this, but to an extent, favouritism will also sadly occur in this "court". Let's not call it a court though lmao. Edited October 13, 2013 by GoldenGates
Cinnamon Posted October 13, 2013 Posted October 13, 2013 this made me lol But I'd support this. This is kinda not necessary, but I don't mind having this
Guest Falixus Posted October 13, 2013 Posted October 13, 2013 It's only a forum /just demote cortana if users don't like her
Lee Posted October 13, 2013 Posted October 13, 2013 If it was only the osbot mods+ then if the people were to be against them, how would their voices be heard? 2
BotRS123 Posted October 13, 2013 Posted October 13, 2013 (edited) The supreme court are the admins. This is not needed. They have the final say. Edited October 13, 2013 by BotRS123
5uck Posted October 13, 2013 Author Posted October 13, 2013 If it was only the osbot mods+ then if the people were to be against them, how would their voices be heard? Interesting point.. Maybe a poll could be made for 24 hours where the community could vote, then the poll results would be factored in as a vote on the final ruling?
Stimpack Posted October 13, 2013 Posted October 13, 2013 But who will keep the Supreme Court in check? inb4 Executive Branch and Legislative Branch proposals. Seriously though, overkill for a botting forum. ^^; 1
Syche Posted October 13, 2013 Posted October 13, 2013 There needs to be an age limit on mods anyways, and we don't need a court on here, maybe just more knowledgeable super mods
Medic Posted October 13, 2013 Posted October 13, 2013 Cortana is underaged anyways, the community will be better without an underaged moderator.
