Chainbanned on proxies

[jjohns]

I don't know what went on but some accounts were banned within 10 seconds of each other, from looking at the logger. All accounts are using different proxies so I'm not sure what happened. Someone said once that jagex might notice the accounts were bots but not ban them until the next "wave" or somethin like that.

Any idea?

[Space]

Did you verify and test you were connected to the proxies as opposed to your home IP?

did you buy public or private proxies?

 

[jjohns]

The proxies are shared between a max of 3 people. I tested the proxies and I always get a failed test. They should be working because if they didn't the osbot client would fail as well. I had bots from the same list of proxies that did not get banned, which makes me think it was not a chain ban but some other reason I don't know about.

[D9BLADEE]

52 minutes ago, jjohns said:

The proxies are shared between a max of 3 people. I tested the proxies and I always get a failed test. They should be working because if they didn't the osbot client would fail as well. I had bots from the same list of proxies that did not get banned, which makes me think it was not a chain ban but some other reason I don't know about.

Doesn't OSBot default to the address of the host machine if the proxy is bad?

[jjohns]

I am unsure. I've test proxies that were supposed to be socks5 but it simply said socks5 error when it tried to boot. The proxies I used did not say that, so idk what's going on.

[ez11]

7 hours ago, D9BLADEE said:

Doesn't OSBot default to the address of the host machine if the proxy is bad?

no the client will just not load

 

@jjohns bans usually happen in waves during the day. Not usual at all to see multiple accs banned at the same time, even if you are on different machines/internet connections (so absolutely no way of getting chainbanned)

[jjohns]

1 hour ago, ez11 said:

 bans usually happen in waves during the day. Not usual at all to see multiple accs banned at the same time, even if you are on different machines/internet connections (so absolutely no way of getting chainbanned)

Hey man. So youre saying it's unusual to see multiple accs banned at the same time? Maybe the waves are spread out enough to get a large amount of accs at once? and mine happened to land in the same wave, idk lol

[ez11]

8 minutes ago, jjohns said:

Hey man. So youre saying it's unusual to see multiple accs banned at the same time? Maybe the waves are spread out enough to get a large amount of accs at once? and mine happened to land in the same wave, idk lol

No that was a typo by me lol. I meant its not unusual.

So it happens a lot.

Just its kinda logical if you have multiple accs doing the same activity and likely running for the same time that they might be picked up at the same time without the ban being a chainban.

Also results in things like having 8/10 accs banned when they are doing the same stuff for the same amount of time.

Edited May 21, 2020 by ez11

[kylebu]

Try having some redundancy, im just starting farming and only have a couple of accounts going but I have a  few accounts doing one thing another few doing another, and another few im playing legit to make money for bonds ect.... might be a good option!

[jjohns]

13 hours ago, ez11 said:

No that was a typo by me lol. I meant its not unusual.

So it happens a lot.

Just its kinda logical if you have multiple accs doing the same activity and likely running for the same time that they might be picked up at the same time without the ban being a chainban.

Also results in things like having 8/10 accs banned when they are doing the same stuff for the same amount of time.

Do you know if they "catch" accounts but don't ban them until later during a wave? Is that what I'm understanding

[ez11]

8 hours ago, jjohns said:

Do you know if they "catch" accounts but don't ban them until later during a wave? Is that what I'm understanding

Thats the point of banwaves. They detect accs and then ban them all together so you dont instantly know what part of your script got you detected.