Pak Yak Posted September 4, 2016 Author Share Posted September 4, 2016 Ban evading too easy on shittbot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnimalSeller Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 Ban evading too easy on shittbot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 why scam though? he needs smokes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adapt Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 Ban evading too easy on shittbot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solzhenitsyn Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 nobody likes a scammer. & nobody gunna trade him now that he has a ton of negatives are they? sounds like a good idea to bombard the scumbag. 1. The user is trash. 2. The staff will ban him after the appeal is approved, watch.. 3. It has nothing to do with popularity, the user is scum and deserves to be hazed for it. Do you have to try to miss the point that hard? OK, lets try again. @Adapt and @SeleneIsLove have both scammed me for 6.9 trillion SolzBucks. I have filed a dispute against them, but in the meantime (i.e., until they are banned), everybody please brigade their feedback score, because they have scammed me -- for 6.9 trillion SolzBucks! Believe me, I have a lot of evidence, but until justice is carried out by the marketplace staff, it won't be public and we have an obligation to protect our fellow users from the trash users Adapt and SeleneIsLove by bombarding them with negative feedback. This way, no one will trade with them. [at mention all of my friends] -- but of course, this has nothing to do with popularity, since we evaluate disputes in a totally nonpartisan way and don't take up the causes of our friends who feel that they have been wronged. If you still don't see how this is a problem, then you guys are just plain retarded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adapt Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 Do you have to try to miss the point that hard? OK, lets try again. @Adapt and @SeleneIsLove have both scammed me for 6.9 trillion SolzBucks. I have filed a dispute against them, but in the meantime (i.e., until they are banned), everybody please brigade their feedback score, because they have scammed me -- for 6.9 trillion SolzBucks! Believe me, I have a lot of evidence, but until justice is carried out by the marketplace staff, it won't be public and we have an obligation to protect our fellow users from the trash users Adapt and SeleneIsLove by bombarding them with negative feedback. This way, no one will trade with them. [at mention all of my friends] -- but of course, this has nothing to do with popularity, since we evaluate disputes in a totally nonpartisan way and don't take up the causes of our friends who feel that they have been wronged. If you still don't see how this is a problem, then you guys are just plain retarded. The user's banned and you're still trying to prove a point. Clearly you're retarded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pak Yak Posted September 4, 2016 Author Share Posted September 4, 2016 Do you have to try to miss the point that hard? OK, lets try again. @Adapt and @SeleneIsLove have both scammed me for 6.9 trillion SolzBucks. I have filed a dispute against them, but in the meantime (i.e., until they are banned), everybody please brigade their feedback score, because they have scammed me -- for 6.9 trillion SolzBucks! Believe me, I have a lot of evidence, but until justice is carried out by the marketplace staff, it won't be public and we have an obligation to protect our fellow users from the trash users Adapt and SeleneIsLove by bombarding them with negative feedback. This way, no one will trade with them. [at mention all of my friends] -- but of course, this has nothing to do with popularity, since we evaluate disputes in a totally nonpartisan way and don't take up the causes of our friends who feel that they have been wronged. If you still don't see how this is a problem, then you guys are just plain retarded. Sorry you got butthurt at @Adapt "trash" comment, and felt you had to throw it back at us. You seem like someone i wouldn't waste my time on, but if you'd like to keep wasting time on me, go for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benz Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 Filed a dispute as well. GG 2.5M and warrior ring (i) :[ 100% worth getting banned for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solzhenitsyn Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 The user's banned and you're still trying to prove a point. Clearly you're retarded. Sorry you got butthurt at @Adapt "trash" comment, and felt you had to throw it back at us. You seem like someone i wouldn't waste my time on, but if you'd like to keep wasting time on me, go for it. The fact that you don't get that this isn't about the scammer who got banned is precisely why I think you're retarded. It wasn't to throw it back at you, it was to show you that brigading is bad because a false positive is so much worse than a false negative -- and if you don't understand that after I've used your names in a hypothetical then I think it's a lost cause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adapt Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 The fact that you don't get that this isn't about the scammer who got banned is precisely why I think you're retarded. It wasn't to throw it back at you, it was to show you that brigading is bad because a false positive is so much worse than a false negative -- and if you don't understand that after I've used your names in a hypothetical then I think it's a lost cause. I completely understand what you're saying. Do I care? Not at all. I'm having this thread deleted/locked as I'm tired of wasting my time on you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
