Twin
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Twin
-
Eh, life is meaningless, we all end up in the same place anyway. Might as well just live through it and see where it gets you. -
I know I was just kidding lol. Czar, eric, and elliot are all very skilled scripters. I hate competition though because it only drives people apart.
-
Why can't we all get along and make osbot a better place
-
Are powerlevels hand done? I need an account from 63/60/41 to 70/70/70.
Osbot is dying
Still looking
http://osbot.org/forum/store/product/518-edgesmelter/ http://osbot.org/forum/store/product/534-twins-cannonball-smither/ http://osbot.org/forum/store/product/546-edgeville-cannonball-smither/
Title pretty much. Can be done by any means so long as it's HAND DONE.
So people support scripters who spent time with members locations and other foods.
I didn't even know this still worked lol. I don't think it will with the new OSbot update.
#HYPETRAIN
It would be a hassle because on free scripts, you get a lot of leaches who don't care how much work you've put into it, and don't even thank tou for the script, just complain. And people would end up getting low rates due to over population, and then you'd just get flooded with complaints.
You can't really release something like this on the SDN. 5 people can use it at once, anymore than that and it is literally useless. Even five is cutting it high. Actually after reading this over it came off as really rude. I didn't mean to be that way. I made one of these a while back, and didn't put it on the SDN for this reason. I have the janky source posted somewhere on the snippets section.
Hmm, I could do this. Would only support f2p items though.
I want to find out the forum user that posted that lmao. I hope they weren't serious.
Not updating until I know it's stable, and no serious issues. I don't want a windows 8 launch all over again.
Its probably waiting for approval on the SDN. You should be able to get it soon.
No script on the SDN will steal your account
There was one, talk to @Apaec about it. He took it down because it wasn't good money anymore.
Add another ) after myPlayer(), That was my fault in the original code I gave you.
if(BANKAREA.contains(myPlayer()&&inventory.isFull()) return State.BANK; Didn't see you had banking already figured out, that's pretty much all you'll need to check for to start banking. Actually thinking back over this, I would do inventory.contains("Cowhide"), that way, you don't run into issues with it not banking and getting stuck in the bank.
That's really not the reason. It's the work involved with this. So much can go wrong in making it. Testing would take forever, and in the end wouldn't really be worth all the ttime.
I know, it was just asked very poorly.
