lolmanden

It is, nobody cares about the ''amount of gold you traded'', It's all about the ''feedback amount''.

Don't get your hopes up. Like the admins even care.

September, @B2B, so low amount, I was unknown at that time in OSBot and not loyal. Now when i'm good friends with the victim and refunded 2x the amount + got nearly 5k post and 100 feedback it's still not enough, so it got to point where its not about my legitimacy but my attitude which is laughable. He has un-TWC'ed couple of people already even though i was put on twc as a first member.

Come on maldesto don't call yourself a scammer be a bit respectful to yourself.

Ask help from your parents or address the issue like you told us to teachers.

More like @lolmanden - still getting cyber bullied by @Maldesto.

Can i ask you something or will you ban me? I don't want to be banned, so i thought would ask you permission before responding lol.

Respect man, I hope one day you'll get you're twc off, but i doubt. Mald is really strict and ignorant about twc removals he thinks scammers will always be scammers.

I don't celebrate it.

Olaf did scam, look at the disputes. And so? It's still 50% of the people.

I edited a bit ago, I said 100-199 feedback in those average as we are talking about the new requirement which I suggested 200 feedback. Not those 1000's or 500's feedback guys. And you are telling me only Pink clay out of the members i've told that are banned. And if you take my insults too seriously then sorry did not meant to do. Though don't insult back, I thought you're a moderator and not an ex-staff.

Sure it does only the fact that you fail to demonstrate the examples of people who did not scam that are 100-199 feedbacks+ considered to people who did actually scam at that amount. You cannot just go and say like that it's like saying ''I am not a scammer, you go first.''. Empty statement from you, yet again.

Stop answering to your own questions and let me do it next time. And it does, the more successful trades its most likely more trusted, common sense.

Can you tell the members (200+ FB) that have scammed? Then lets shall wait for lots and lots of scams to occur. I should get a pop-corn either for the dispute section.

The ratio (%) of 100+ feedback member group of scamquitting is really high in OSBot rather than 200+ feedback. I am working on a list of scammers with 100+ feedback right now.

Incorrect statement. Re-think about what you just said.

P.S I know you are looking forward to scamquitting when you reach 100 feedback and for that reason, I must up it to prevent people like you.

Too many people (Verified transactors) members are scamquitting, I can list a bunch. I don't consider ''Verified'' to be only a person with 100 feedback ONLY. The fact is they have that pip reading ''verified'' they are able to blindfold the new members of OSBot. The proper requirement for the ''Verified transactor'' would be; minimum 200 feedback. Edit: So people think 100 feedback people are legit? @Miley Cyrus @Violent (Note: Did scam, but refunded) @Amazon @PipiDaga @Simon There could be more too.

Ikr

All day long son.

Of course not, In it for post count.

Same thing, I was trying to mean EoC system. I don't mind the graphics.