Occazn

Just wondering what type of action would be taken towards the scenario I'm about to show. First off, lets call the Buyer of the firecape service "Homosexual" and the seller of the firecape service "BigBoyOccazn" Homosexual takes pictures of a bank that isn't his of a relatively large value such as 100M+. BigBoyOccazn logs onto the account. BigBoyOccazn doesn't check the bank, he does the firecape, everything went well, firecape is done and logs off. But when Homosexual logs back in, Homosexual states that 95M of his bank is gone. He provides screenshots of his before bank "The fake 100M Screenshotted bank" and the after bank *Which could have been transferred to another account*. How would BigBoyOccazn defend himself from this when someone devised a plan to try to get him banned for something he didn't do? All everybody else would know is that Homosexual could have had a bank of 100M, and BigBoyOccazn did in fact log onto the account. Nobody knows that BigBoyOccazn did, in fact, take the 95M and nobody knows if Homosexual actually had a 100M bank. What would happened to BigBoyOccazn? BASICALLY, Someone is trying to frame BigBoyOccazn for something he didn't do and has evidence of IP logs, before bank and after bank, even though the bank pictures could be fake. *if this doesn't make sense, I'll try to simplify it. I'm really bad at storytelling *

may the power of buddha compell u

u wot now $200 on PA

You're right about the MM rule, it can be debated, some people can see it as you interacting with two people, but some people also see it as ONE solid trade, it is debatable about that. The thing that happened to Led could of been an mistake, but like you said everyone made mistakes, if it was it can be erased obviously and forgotten about. Yeah, but if you were here in the reign of Peter, he had one mistake with a member called Medic, and got demoted for that one mistake.

I don't understand why anyone would give two fucks anyways, it wasn't a ban, it was a warning, it's not like he breaks rules daily. ^Which mod edited that into my post? I want to know. It wasn't the fact that he got warned instead of banned, and a warning means nothing, it's the principle. Getting warned for a BS reason so much as mentioning another botting community isn't necessarily the best feeling in the world. It makes you think of the moderator that did it as power-abusing, and needs to calm down a bit. Sure, the warning will expire, but getting in trouble for something that doesn't make sense isn't right. The MM feedback rule is a dumb rule in my honest opinion. The role "Trader" is there for a reason, and to me, I think if you get a feedback from a MM, it shows that you aren't a scammer even more so than just trading 1 on 1. It makes it look like you like to take precautionary measures against somebody in which you don't trust, and they don't trust you as well. Lastly, this is a forum, the purpose of the mods is to keep the forum cleaned up and monitored, if you guys think going against them will work you're wrong, You have to see the argument from both perspectives and understand what the fuck is going on before you riot. No one is necessarily starting a riot, people are just complaining at the fact of rules that don't make sense and warnings that don't make sense as well. If your country's government did something that went public and didn't make any sense at all, what would you do? Would you sit there and say "Well I guess I can understand their perspective of it" or would you complain about it by providing logic-thought evidence towards why you think it's a bad idea, and why you think their actions don't make sense.

>wat

I agree, everybody does make mistakes. But, however, when Peter made ONE small mistake, he got instantly demoted. What's happening here? There can't be bias in anywhere, and equality is a must. If this is true, a certain somebody must get demoted or somebody else should get re-promoted.

This isn't directed towards any moderator on here, I'm just trying to open up a discussion and see what the community thinks about it. I think moderators should operate these forums in a manner in which shows that they're an intellectual themselves and can show a professional aspect of being a moderator, but should also show that they can screw around and have fun. They also shouldn't focus on emotions in which bias is coming into play. Such as if you don't like somebody, you give them a harder punishment than others. A sort of action that recently happened that I do not approve of was when Led Zeppelin was given a warning for mentioning the word "aribot". The rules state you aren't allowed to advertise other websites. I'm fairly sure that just saying the word "aribot" isn't against the rules. If it is, then this forum might as well be operated by the Chinese government. The makers of this site made it so the name of other botting communities is censored for a reason. I honestly don't think they care, and mentioning another botting community isn't advertising it in any way at all. Regarding the recent rule of the MiddleMan not allowed to give the buyer/seller feedback. Who made that rule? The "trader" is there for a reason. It's a ring of feedbacks. I give everybody feedback, basically because we all participated in a trade, and all of us presented ourselves as trustworthy. I see no reason as to why we aren't allowed to give a feedback for MM'ing. I may edit more into this post later on if I feel the need to or if I discover another

DIS WARNING POST GIVEN BY KATI IS HERE 4EVER WHEN IS IT GOING TO EXPIRE IT'S BEEN 2 MONTHS PLPEASE HELP ME MODS PLEASE SOMEBODY

yeah, i'd rather just make my own account and bot more than 1.4m in one day with that account.

1-2 months ago? wtf. we had one back in april bro.

Where am I nub srry u aren't part of the double verified club

Occazn's unbanning service - 500k per unban - Must vouch after 210+ feedback/verifiedx2 - PM me

@Skype @Occazn @Divica

Hey , you hear that? The buyer is NEVER safe whilst doing account sales. On topic, I feel that there could be legit people trying to sell accounts with no feedback. It's all up to the buyer on whether or not they can trust the seller. I wouldn't recommend trading with anybody with 0 feedback for accounts, though EDIT Tried to link dutch farmer since he was flaming me about this, didn't work though. sorry. :c

http://osbot.org/forum/topic/13082-giving-himself-fake-feedback/ I feel it unfair that others had all their feedback removed whilst you get to keep all yours. I demand that all your feedback is removed as well, as this is America and Equality is a must. not joking by the way pls do this @Smart @Master Chief @Raflesia

i hope u die jeff

To make a change, go to My money in your Profile, then update the “My preapproved payments” section.

renewals* it'll autopay w/ your default payment method.

Doing more this weekend! PM me on skype @ child.azn

wtf when are u going to interview me

I took the picture off his facebook and replicated it of that. Smart didn't like releasing his face to the world of OSBot, so you guys can't comprehend how well of a job I did.

I heard he was killed in a fatal car accident whilst transporting his marijuana to his other pot head friends. A rival gang member came up and attacked. Here, I will re-enact what happened that exact day.