Hi G00gle

I find it strange that everyone is guessing but no one is recommending some testing. Get your hands on a copy of Hiren's boot CD (You can download it to a USB, and boot from it), and then run the MemTest, along with some CPU torture program. If you don't want to create such a bootable, then I would download Prime95, which puts alot of pressure on your CPU/RAM, if it doesn't turn off while running, it is probably not your CPU / RAM. Also, can you post a full log of what hardware you got? Edit: If you are on Windows 10: Go to Start, typ eventvwr - Then go to Windows logs, and go to System. and take a careful look at the red ' ! ' signs, if you find any - Please post them below.

Not sure why it happens, but it might be wise to post a topic in client bugs & suggestions so Alek can help/assist you further on what's wrong.

Not sure how your stance is against refurbished laptops, but you might want to look at these. For around 450-500 you will have a nice one, but bear in mind that it is not brand new.

Yet humans create the bots.

@D Bolter can help you out with the proxies. If you use a webwalking script, bear in mind that it _might_ use around 2GB ram per client. 64 / 2 = 32. Not sure about the processor, but in CLI it should be capable of running alot.

What are the results of $JAVA_HOME/bin/java -version ?

Do you find any hs pid error on the desktop or wherever you are launching the OSBot.jar from?

Or whatever you are doing is detected, not the client.

Are you using proxies?

How do you mean 'not receiving more than 10kb'? And what error is thrown at you?

Yes, that's what I meant with delayed bans for that period of time. If it's delayed that long (if), then that would mean they get more reports than they could handle, and I somehow doubt that.

It cannot be delayed from previous botting. Seeing as that would mean Jagex' is 22 days behind schedule, which I find hard to believe. Be aware when purchasing accounts I guess.

Weird. I'm not sure, but this would basically mean that they are still looking at the registration IP of the account, and the current activities being done on that registration IP? So what I'm saying is, they will basically still hammer all the accounts that were in posession of the registration IP?

I think this will help you: https://johann.loefflmann.net/en/software/jarfix/index.html

I always laugh at this. Basically you are too addicted to really quit, seeing as you need to fill in that time you used to play RuneScape on, but on the other hand you feel burned out... Guess I've never been addicted. ?

That's not what I am saying. Solely depending on a machine is wrong and should never be done in a working environment, ever. Why do you think IT helpdesks are so full all the time? Jagex is actually smart for reviewing this.

Wherever humans work, there are mistakes. How often has it happened that there was a mistake in the bot detection which then again was admitted by Jagex theirselves? If you were to automate the proces, it might trigger that system and it would lead to a ban. Bans should never be automated like that. Even _if_ there was to be some sort of review, that would take you back to the same way they are doing now: Manual bans. It just wouldn't be as high scaled probably, but still none the less the same.

No. Simply because a machine is performing the input the human has given, and since humans are giving the input, mistakes are made, so it wouldn't be wise to actually let a system automate that proces.

I've answered most in red text, seeing as that gives a more clear view of the information.

First things first. There are a few regular (No server) motherboards that do support dual processors, but they are around 300 to 500 euro's (even more USD). With that being said, I haven't even mentioned the processors itself. Now, there are server(s) motherboards available that support this, but again, you will be looking at around 330-500 euro's (more USD). Now let's get tactical on your theory about the cores. Let's say for example, I have the AMD Ryzen 5 (6 core, with HT so that equals 12). In your theory you are saying that you can run 24 bots. There is no way you will succeed in that, simply because you are doing the wrong maths. You are saying 100 / 12 = 8,33 - Have you ever seen mirror mode operational with only 8,33 CPU usage? No way. And even if you manage to get it under that, some, if not all clients will freeze at some point since they will spike above, and if it takes to long to get a reaction it will time out and just blatantly freeze. Now for the CPU you mentioned, 8 cores. 100 / 8 = 12,5 per core. Even that is not possible, it's basically mirroring your client with more features that take even more resources. If I'm not mistaken, wasn't the bare minimum 2GB ram though per mirror mode client? Also, it's a pain in the ass to setup so many mirror mode clients, since some clients tend to attach to other clients, so that basically means it might be that you have to close all clients and restart again (I can talk from experience, since I've ran 1 1/2 years ago many mirror mode clients).

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23771129/cant-test-connection-to-mysql-using-intellij Are you able to get a connection? A solution might be in there, thought I'd put it in here.

Not sure where you heard this, but they will surely not. The weapon has been out for a couple of years now, and there is/was no Q&A this week so you've probably heard a hoax to lower the price on a bigger scale.

We have discussed it in the staff chat, and have come to the conclusion that we like the new link more. Sorry for the inconvenience!

Why would you want to create a VM for that? Proxifier itself will do just fine, you won't need a VM for that.

I highly doubt that. If you believe in flagged ip's and such, they _might_ be able to flag a data center at one point - But that doesn't mean they insta-ban.