IamNotAHuman

I'll talk about the science part you talked about first, cause that's the fun stuff All the things you said are true as far as I know, and your mass-energy equivalence is what was so important in my post, that mass makes up the majority of the positive energy, while the gravitational attraction makes up the negative energy. And as for dark energy and dark matter, I'm not confident enough on the topics to really talk much about them, but there have been large experiments which have hinted at experimental proof of dark matter. Also, since the a lot of the science around dark matter in dark energy is fairly well founded, I think its better to think of them not as some problem in our theory, but as something our theory has discovered. Now on to the God stuff, science does not deny the existence of God, because science proves things. But the point is, the burden of proof lies with the person making the claim. Now you can argue that the claim is "God does not exist", but since it is impossible to prove the non-existence of anything, the point is mute. There is no way to prove something does not exist, all you can prove is that we can not currently observe it's existence. So to say "prove us wrong" is simply a cheap way of trying to win an argument. Believers of leprechauns simply has to say "Prove us wrong", believers that the universe is actually held in a tiny marble in the hand of child simply has to say "Prove Us Wrong", believers that there is a unicorn flying through the vacuum of space all alone, while constantly being tortured by a radio which plays Rick Astley on loop..."Prove Us Wrong". The only things which hold ground in world of saying they exist are things which you have proof of existing. Now you can also have proof that things might exist, this would be indirect evidence. This can be applied to things such as aliens, but the same conclusion cannot be drawn about a God. With aliens, we have observable proof that life can begin on a planet, and we have observable proof that there are other Earth-like planets with conditions fit for life, so we can draw a conclusion that there is measurable chance of life beginning on another planet other than our own. Now with declaring the existence of God, there is no direct, or indirect proof. Scripture is not any more proof of a God than sailor tales are proof of the Loch Ness Monster. There is nothing to even suggest that God must exist, so the existence of a God holds as much ground as belief in that unicorn I mentioned previously. It may seem ridiculous, but that's really how it is, and hopefully it shows you how proof of non-existence is a terrible argument. So all we really say about God is, there is no reason for me to believe such a claim. Oh, don't get me wrong, I completely understand where you're coming from with the Unicorn. I don't believe in a God because of the scripture itself as it would be no different from me believing in something like Harry Potter, all I'm saying is that I believe due to the faith I have now having read said scripture. That's really all it is and all we have-a belief- be it right or wrong. It's no different than believing something such as Santa, or the Tooth Fairy.

I've posted this in another thread about racism, may aswell post it here too. What bothers me most about racism is that it's all circumstantial. If Dave Chappelle is on stage ragging white people, it's 'funny'. If Carlos Mencia is on stage talking about African Americans it's 'funny' but if a white man said -anything- about any group of people he's automatically labeled a racist. He'll be put on CNN,NBC,Fox and any other media for it. As a white male that grew up in Louisiana, I've seen things from both sides. I know where to go and where not to go though, especially in New Orleans. Is it racist that I feel my life is in danger when I drive through the streets because of the violence? Also, movies like Django(if you've seen it) amongst tons of other movies portray white people as the devil, or evil. Also note that this movie used the N word more than 100 times, mostly by Jamie Foxx.

JaGeX can't ban you from client alone as they have no direct way of knowing if you're using their loader, Advertising other bots isn't allowed., Swift Kit, OSBot, etc unless they looked at your files on your computer which is against the law. Bot Busting Moderate comes from a Jmod, not from their bot detection system.

I spoke to my friend about this thread since he's the most knowledgeable person I know on any type of science. I sent what he told me to the OP, but since you brought it up I'll throw it in here as well. Well, there's the law of conservation of energy, and there's the law of conservation of mass. In reality they aren't two separate laws, but two parts of one law: The law of conservation of mass and energy. The law of conservation of mass says that matter can neither be created or destroyed (it's a useful in a chemistry class because during chemical reactions this half of the combined law is true: the mass of products created HAS to equal the mass of reactants use) and the law of conservation of energy says that energy cannot be created or destroyed but only change forms (touch a light bulb and the electricity makes it out, so you're going from electrical energy (the flow of electrons) to heat energy (friction from the electrons moving)) But the big thing is matter and energy are the same thing they aren't different things so much as they're just two sides of the same coin Einstein's famous equation: E=mc^2 shows this relationship what the equation says is that energy equals mass multiplied by the speed of light multiplied by the speed of light again. In practice what the equation means is that energy and mass can be converted from one form to another Something Hiroshima and Nagasaki know very well During a nuclear reaction, either during fission when the nucleus of an atom breaks into multiple parts or during fusion when two nuclei come together to make a larger nucleus (and often times other smaller bits) mass is lost and energy is given off What scientists noticed was that when a nucleus broke apart the sum of the pieces left over weighed LESS than what they had to begin with What they also noticed was that relatively large of amount of energy was produced So they hypothesized that the energy produced came from the matter that disappeared. Subsequent observations and experiments bore this out Now, the flipside is that while matter can be annihilated and produce energy, energy can also make matter. Once a certain amount of energy is achieved at a given point in space it starts to behave as if it has mass. Because it does have mass During the big bang, there was an TREMENDOUS amount of energy in a very, very, very, very, infinitely small space through mechanisms that I do not understand fully, this energy ended up becoming the matter of our universe Now, with matter we have regular matter that we're familiar with and anti matter that we are normally exposed to from a perception standpoint (even though we can't see an electron, we can see the effects of electrons) but a positron is not something that we routinely get to observe in action electrons have a positive charge electrons are negative not positive Positrons are positively charged electrons when a positron and an electron collide with each other, they also destroy each other the mass is transformed into energy well there are also our "normal" positively charged protons but they also can be negatively charged protons (the name escapes me, but I think they're simply called anti-protons) Well from what we can gather neither our normal set of matter or the abnormal anti-matter are prefered over the other It came down to probability Flip a coin and 50% of the time you should get heads and 50% of the time you should get tails but you never do (rarely anyway) Flip a coin 10 times and you might get 6 heads and 4 tails that's 60%/40% or you may get 5 and 5 or 7 and 3 and so on Flip a coin a billion times however you'll get really close to 50%/50% but you'll very unlikely get 500,000,000 heads and 500,000,000 tails. You'll probably get closer to 499,999,000 and 500,000,100. I'm making the numbers up, but for illustrative purposes that should work Well that's what happened when our universe was formed during the big bang nearly equal amounts of regular matter and anti matter were created but regular matter was produced just slightly more on average so we have a universe that is composed primarily of normal matter (the only thing that makes it normal matter is that it's what we're used to) Now we get to dark matter Dark matter and dark energy are ideas that physicists have come up with to explain some unexpected phenomena From their observations galaxies spend too fast faster than they should if they were composed of just matter (regular or anti-matter makes no difference) so they hypothesize that a new type of matter and energy that doesn't interact much with matter or anti-matter exists and they call it dark matter and dark energy because they cannot observe it. Now there are some possibilities here 1) We just don't have the technology yet to observe these particles and energy, but may eventually do so. or 2) These particles do not exist in reality and the scientists are wrong in their hypothesize For the most part, scientists as a whole will be fine with either two possibilities so long as they know as an addendum to point 2) they would then need to reevaluate our current model of physics such as how gravity works on large scales Now the reason I say scientists would be happy with either outcome is because both outcomes give scientists another path to move down. If our current technology isn't good enough then we have to develop technology to do the job which could be beneficial for other disciplines (a lot of the technology that is used in modern computers and cellphones comes from research into quantum mechanics and so on).Also if scientists understand what is wrong with our current models and can make them more accurate, then again, more technology can be developed. Basically,what I got out of this was: Science is either right or wrong, much like Religion. We don't know, and that's just the nature of the beast. It's very fun to speculate, but it takes the fun out when people say that there is no -insert name of whatever you believe in- because at the end of the day, there's really no proof of it being real or not. I can't prove it just as much as you can disprove it, but that's why there's faith. You may think it's silly to believe in,what George Carlin(RIP) refers to as a "Man in the clouds" but it's no different than believing that shit just randomly started happening for no reason and that this Universe, Earth and all it's inhabitants are here just by a stroke of luck by 1/100000000000000000000000% chance. To say there's no God without proof is to say that Humans are the ONLY intellectual beings in this Universe/Galaxy/Solar System. If there's us, there's the possibility of what people think Aliens to be, since we're here from a scientific cataclysm they could be too,correct? Just because it hasn't been discovered yet doesn't mean it's not there. *On the note of Aliens, anything E.T is Alien. A micro organism on Mars is Alien, although he may not be a little gray man with creepy eyes.* Do I believe in God? Well..yes. When I was younger I didn't, but when I was younger I wasn't as open minded as I am now. Having read the Bible and other scriptures from other religions and keeping myself open to multiple facets of life, rather than one I do believe in a God. It may not be the Christian God, it may not one of the many Gods in Hindu, Greek, or Chinese mythology but I do believe in something and if, or when it's ready to do something it will. It won't be in my life time, it won't be in my kid's either probably, but something will happen. Earth will die, our Sun will die, everything will die eventually and who knows what will happen. As far as Religion goes, here's another set of quotes from Angels And Demons. “Whether or not you believe in God, you must believe this: when we as a species abandon our trust in a power greater than us, we abandon our sense of accountability. Faiths… all faiths… are admonitions that there is something we cannot understand, something to which we are accountable. With faith we are accountable to each other, to ourselves, and to a higher truth. Religion is flawed, but only because man is flawed. The church consists of a brotherhood of imperfect, simple souls wanting only to be a voice of compassion in a world spinning out of control.” tl;dr: Religion is flawed because man is flawed. Evil happens, and it doesn't have to be in the name of Religion “Faith is universal. Our specific methods for understanding it are arbitrary. Some of us pray to Jesus, some of us go to Mecca, some of us study subatomic particles. In the end we are all just searching for truth, that which is greater than ourselves.”

Itching

You know I used to think the same way but I read this in a book, which helped me look at it differently. “You are confused because the Bible describes God as an omnipotent and benevolent deity…Omnipotent-benevolent simply means that God is all-powerful and well-meaning.” I understand the concept. It’s just…there seems to be a contradiction.” Yes. The contradiction is pain. Man’s starvation, war, sickness…” Exactly!” Chartrand knew the camerlengo would understand. “Terrible things happen in this world. Human tragedy seems like proof that God could not possibly be both all-powerful and well-meaning. If He loves us and has the power to change our situation, He would prevent our pain, wouldn’t He?” The Camerlengo frowned. “Would He?” Chartrand felt uneasy. Had he overstepped his bounds? Was this one of those religious questions you just didn’t ask? “Well…if God loves us, and He can protect us, He would have to. It seems He is either omnipotent and uncaring, or benevolent and powerless to help.” Do you have children, Lieutenant?” Chartrand flushed. “No, signore.” Imagine you had an eight-year-old son…would you love him?” Of course.” Would you let him skateboard?” Chartrand did a double take. The camerlengo always seemed oddly “in touch” for a clergyman. “Yeah, I guess,” Chartrand said. “Sure, I’d let him skateboard, but I’d tell him to be careful.” So as this child’s father, you would give him some basic, good advice and then let him go off and make his own mistakes?” I wouldn’t run behind him and mollycoddle him if that’s what you mean.” But what if he fell and skinned his knee?” He would learn to be more careful.” The camerlengo smiled. “So although you have the power to interfere and prevent your child’s pain, you would choose to show your love by letting him learn his own lessons?” Of course. Pain is part of growing up. It’s how we learn.” The camerlengo nodded. “Exactly.” tl:dr God is a parent, he gives advice and we make our own mistakes but he doesn't follow behind us and watch everything we do. He wants us to be more careful, and although he has the power to prevent all the pain we endure, he wants us to learn from what we do to better ourselves. The book is Angels and Demons, by Dan Brown, if anyone is curious.

I sent a request. Xbox controller feels so much nicer in my hands than a playstation's..idk. I think I'm just used to it.

Better than those 'Keep Calm and....' shirts I've seen.

Supernatural is good if you're like,I don't know..a 15 year old girl. I watched the first five eps and it was the worst..feel along the lines of Teen Wolf on MTV.

There's players that actually do that, they call themselves Purist. Some of the accounts I've seen are pretty impressive. Haha 'survival' did it for me. Crafting your own runes to go pking? Aint no body got time fo' dat According to them,pking is a form of trading,per se, so they don't pk.

Heard this a while back when it came out and didn't care for it very much. He may not want to admit it, but he is a lot like Tyler lol.

Watson is probably a closet freak. I'm not a fan of red hair,dyed or natural though,so..Watson.

Squirtle and Bulbasaur are my favorites. I can't pick or choose between the two.

I like the first one because of the background but the second one looks much better. It's clean, and legible. I had trouble reading what the words said in the first one..looked like "Coaleon Fanny."

You dont get it, thats how i do it normally and ive never been baned for bottin. But this is different mannn there banning people by seeing you use the client period. They can't ban you by client, because they can't tell if you're using a bot client or swiftkit, or any other type of loader. Unless Jagex could see your screen through remote access or something like that, the client is the last thing to worry about.

Mexico holds that title now, America isn't the fattest country anymore. Flags

Post your GT: Chasing Colors What game(s) you play: Bo2, Borderlands 2, few random arcade games when I feel like it. Bad Company 2/Battlefield 3, although I hadn't been on in a while. What type of mode do you play: Majority of the time I play TDM on Bo2 unless my friend wants to play something different. BF3 was just TDM and Conquest. I'm not all that great with CoD since Bo2 is the first one I ever owned..I got the game on release for the zombies but I can't stand them in Black Ops 2 so I had the game on the shelf for a long time..just recently started playing.

Considering those words have no intellectual meaning to them, there's really no point in them. I remember when Jagex made the profanity filter and people abused the hell out of it..doesn't make you mature, but immature to be honest. We can be old enough to say them,but there's no point in it honestly.

Did you make a fake post using someone else's name? I've had a friend get banned trying to make a troll post for me,lol.

Bacon

Been anticipating 1.18.x since the "Expected update" thread that was made, most notably the webwalking. Keep it up! :3 e/ 1.8.x. Whoops. We're getting close.

I've got about 20 hours logged and I haven't even seen a yo-yo lmao. Grats to everyone getting party hats though. :p

Wonder if I should change my pass..I hadn't been on Advertising other bots isn't allowed. in about two months.

Tried it before and it really wasn't -that- bad. Same goes for thousand year old eggs. So,yum. Biscuits and gravy.

Same thing for yew long bows, both cutting and stringing.