Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/26/13 in all areas

  1. Hello everyone, We are very glad and proud to announce that with this release the SDN is finally available for public. Furthermore this version contains a couple of bug fixes for bugs introduced with 1.5.12. Work on randoms that has been done: Fixed lost and found (appendages teleportation random) Modify Molly partially, untested though Fixed freaky forester Fixed maze Work on the OSBot client that has been done: Added SDN script availability New accounts GUI and backend support Random management system Ads no longer pop up when you're not running a script GUI buttons are back to how they were before, like real buttons General bug fixes all over the place Please note that the SDN is still very immature and we might have to update a couple of times in the future to remove bugs that we have missed. To add scripts, go to the store here: http://osbot.org/forum/store/ and check out the scripts you want to add. Then click the refresh button to load them in your script selector. We will be releasing a manual for script developers and for bot users how to use the SDN in the coming days. Also, in the coming days we will start adding scripts to the SDN and give access to the SDN for script developers. Download can be found here: http://osbot.org Sincerely, OSBot.org
    9 points
  2. I have added a tiny utility to set your fixed default worlds and start a specific world. This will be available on the next release. Stay tuned! OSBot.org
    2 points
  3. It has became aware to me that Moderators are not allowed to participate in anything regarding the marketplace. It kind of makes me upset though because some Moderators like "Rare" for instance have one of the best reputations in the marketplace. And now that I will not be able to do business with them anymore or at least let them MM my trade kind of makes me more worried. I understand that this rule is to cover yourselves from a Moderator scamming but I think letting Moderators having the option to be involved in a place where trust is needed the most isn't that bad of an idea. Of course though this would mean Moderators having to be chosen wisely but isn't that supposed to be happening. This suggestion wasn't meant to be mean or hurt. Just thought I would put my imput out there, it is ok if you disagree. Thanks for your consideration. Smart.
    1 point
  4. That was a typo, should have been "when you're not running a script".
    1 point
  5. If a moderator wants to scam, the restriction doesn't really matter because if they're going to scam, they don't care about the restriction. People will still trust moderators regardless of whether they are supposed to participate or not. I don't see the point. I support the OP.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...