April 17, 20169 yr You're both obviously new here so no, donating does not show you are trustworthy cause you can get a 200m trade and pocket 100$ for almost no loss No newer than you Out of just a greyname and a $250 donator, the donator can imply slightly more trust. Keyword here; slightly. A factor is also age of account/creation date. If there is a newly created account with Donator status, I agree then there is no difference in trust. But a 1year+ account with donator has something to lose. Even if they profit from 1-time 1-off scam. The future earning potential would be greater.
April 17, 20169 yr You're both obviously new here so no, donating does not show you are trustworthy cause you can get a 200m trade and pocket 100$ for almost no loss agree, we have seen so many $100 donor/Lifetime sponsor scams..
April 17, 20169 yr agree, we have seen so many $100 donor/Lifetime sponsor scams.. If there is a newly created account with Donator status, I agree then there is no difference in trust. But a 1year+ account with donator has something to lose. Even if they profit from 1-time 1-off scam. The future earning potential would be greater. Implying a slightly trust than having no-donator status at all.
April 17, 20169 yr If there is a newly created account with Donator status, I agree then there is no difference in trust. But a 1year+ account with donator has something to lose. Even if they profit from 1-time 1-off scam. The future earning potential would be greater. Implying a slightly trust than having no-donator status at all. I agree with this in a way but feel like we just need to remove those VIP/Sponsor/Cheapest tags alltogether.
April 23, 20169 yr You have my support, but I doubt the people who have will be on board since some of them had the intention of doing that when they bought it.
April 23, 20169 yr only did it cause others do it aswell id be happy to remove it if everyone did :p looks indeed abit silly
Create an account or sign in to comment