Client Version: 2.3.73

 

Bug: The isVisible() boolean is returning false when it should be true.

 

How to replicate: I wrote this to test it during the first trade screen

 

if (widgets.isVisible(335, 10)){

log("TRADE SCREEN VISIBLE");

}

I was not able to reproduce the issue, visibility is working as intended.

    boolean visible;


    @Override
    public int onLoop() throws InterruptedException {
        RS2Widget widget = getWidgets().get(261, 66);
        visible = widget != null && widget.isVisible();
        return 500;
    }


    @Override
    public void onPaint(Graphics2D g) {
        g.drawString("Run widget is visible: " + visible, 10, 60);
    }

 

I was not able to reproduce the issue, visibility is working as intended.

    boolean visible;


    @Override
    public int onLoop() throws InterruptedException {
        RS2Widget widget = getWidgets().get(261, 66);
        visible = widget != null && widget.isVisible();
        return 500;
    }


    @Override
    public void onPaint(Graphics2D g) {
        g.drawString("Run widget is visible: " + visible, 10, 60);
    }

 

I thought you neevr used static ID's? 

Visible widgets seems to work fine for me.

 

@@ProjectPact

Are you sure you used the right widgets?

 

Did you try using it like Alek did above ^ ?

Maybe the method widgets#isVisible(parent, child) is broken?

 

Khaleesi

Edited June 10, 201510 yr by Khaleesi

I thought you neevr used static ID's? 

Visible widgets seems to work fine for me.

 

@@ProjectPact

Are you sure you used the right widgets?

 

Did you try using it like Alek did above ^ ?

Maybe the method widgets#isVisible(parent, child) is broken?

 

Khaleesi

 

 

I have originally been using widgets#isVisible(parent, child)... so maybe that is it. 

I have originally been using widgets#isVisible(parent, child)... so maybe that is it. 

 

Ya that's what i though, just try to use widgets.Visible();

Let us know if that changed it

I thought you neevr used static ID's? 

 

 

There is very limited use of static ids in the API, no sense in using patterns to test something specific like visibility.

There is very limited use of static ids in the API, no sense in using patterns to test something specific like visibility.

 

I was just kidding