Good stuff mang, keep at it. If this test fails continue to innovate! Not sure if you saw my threas before but I detailed a similar problem with scripts in the past. They're in-humanly efficient. This is because scripts nowadays execute a certain part of code as SOON as it realizes a certain condition is met (Task-Based scripts). MY proposed solution was to break a Task into two states: Needed() and doable(). When a task is needed, it will be activated very quickly, but when it's only doable it would simulate a player's reaction time.

 

Yeah, it's just like the scientific method mang.

 

-First form hypothesis.

-Then conduct a test which tests your new variable. As Arctic said you need to observe the effects of both using your anti-ban and not using it in order to gain accurate results.

-Finally, collect your results and tell us what you learned.

 

 

 

As to everyone else, unless you've formed your own Hypotheses AND tested them then you're talking bullshit. At least Jose has come up with a solid hypothesis based on logical reasoning and given a possible test case.

This wasn't my idea, it was cory. But I tried to make it into a reality and some more. I do remember reading your topic about adding priority into a task. Which don't sound too hard to inplement. I'll see if I could think of something.

Don't hate, innovate !

That is actually really interesting, yet ironic - the less antiban there is, the less detectable lol.

Just a heads up I released the source. Under mouse handler

That is actually really interesting, yet ironic - the less antiban there is, the less detectable lol.

well 'antiban' is more like ban, not antiban

My favorite scripts are the ones where it walks to a botting location, but stops 4-5 times to check your stats in a random skill.