WhenPigsFly Posted June 4, 2014 Posted June 4, 2014 i agree that some sort of monetary value needs to be traded to gain feedback .
Aza Posted June 4, 2014 Posted June 4, 2014 I support. But this isn't gonna stop someone "charging" 1m for that 1xp gain if they really wanted to get feedback like that...
RetardedSkiddy Posted June 4, 2014 Posted June 4, 2014 Support. But are we gonna enforce it heavy or nah?
RoomScape Posted June 4, 2014 Author Posted June 4, 2014 Still doesn't stop people farmng it, No real way to prove if the account had 10M risk or 1M risk they could just both agree 'yup lets feedback and say was 1M risk'I'm not saying let there be any money on the account. Just that you have to pay for a service if you want fb.
Mind Tricks Posted June 4, 2014 Posted June 4, 2014 I'm not saying let there be any money on the account. Just that you have to pay for a service if you want fb. Yes I know but think of this. Person A (Buyer): Hey I'll pay 500k for Waterfall Quest Person B (Seller): Okay sure, But we need to charge 1M for feedback and I REALLLY want my Feedback to expand on my sales Person A (Buyer): Well I will just say I paid 1Mil so I can leave Feedback and you do the same? Person B (Seller): Sure thing, don't tell anybody though!
RoomScape Posted June 4, 2014 Author Posted June 4, 2014 Yes I know but think of this. Person A (Buyer): Hey I'll pay 500k for Waterfall Quest Person B (Seller): Okay sure, But we need to charge 1M for feedback and I REALLLY want my Feedback to expand on my sales Person A (Buyer): Well I will just say I paid 1Mil so I can leave Feedback and you do the same? Person B (Seller): Sure thing, don't tell anybody though! Difference is that when they get caught, they get infracted - maybe banned since it's considered fb fraud - and that's that. It's a hell of a lot better than the current one, though. I support. But this isn't gonna stop someone "charging" 1m for that 1xp gain if they really wanted to get feedback like that... There should also be a rule stating no fb farming, which what you mentioned would obviously be categorized as such.
Administrator Maldesto Posted June 7, 2014 Administrator Posted June 7, 2014 If I go to a users feedback and see 100 bond trades, or a user with a few 100M trades, it is up for me to decide who is more trust worthy. Number of feedback doesn't mean "trustworthy" to me. My one feedback is worth more than about 50% of people with over 100 that are doing bond trades. It is your judgement to go through and see what they are. If someone has a bond shop and has sold over 500 bonds they would have 0 feedback according to your logic. Just because they didn't do as much wealth doesn't mean they aren't trusted. It is all about how you look at it. I think a bond is the perfect amount. 1
The Hero of Time Posted June 7, 2014 Posted June 7, 2014 If I go to a users feedback and see 100 bond trades, or a user with a few 100M trades, it is up for me to decide who is more trust worthy. Number of feedback doesn't mean "trustworthy" to me. My one feedback is worth more than about 50% of people with over 100 that are doing bond trades. It is your judgement to go through and see what they are. If someone has a bond shop and has sold over 500 bonds they would have 0 feedback according to your logic. Just because they didn't do as much wealth doesn't mean they aren't trusted. It is all about how you look at it. I think a bond is the perfect amount. Your feedback is fishy if someone else would have this kind of fb, it would get removed instantly o.O
Administrator Maldesto Posted June 7, 2014 Administrator Posted June 7, 2014 Your feedback is fishy if someone else would have this kind of fb, it would get removed instantly o.O Wow I forgot that was even there, figured they would have deleted that, just skipped over it since I knew that the feedback I posted was a while ago.
Volta Posted June 7, 2014 Posted June 7, 2014 Dat 1m minimum. You practically farm it anyways with all of your bond sales, RoomScape
RoomScape Posted June 7, 2014 Author Posted June 7, 2014 If I go to a users feedback and see 100 bond trades, or a user with a few 100M trades, it is up for me to decide who is more trust worthy. Number of feedback doesn't mean "trustworthy" to me. My one feedback is worth more than about 50% of people with over 100 that are doing bond trades. It is your judgement to go through and see what they are. If someone has a bond shop and has sold over 500 bonds they would have 0 feedback according to your logic. Just because they didn't do as much wealth doesn't mean they aren't trusted. It is all about how you look at it. I think a bond is the perfect amount. according to my logic, what?And doing a free service proves someone is trusted?
Nezz Posted June 7, 2014 Posted June 7, 2014 This is already a thing. 100k 07gp must be involved. or 1m rs3 gp. or $1 for graphics.
The Hero of Time Posted June 7, 2014 Posted June 7, 2014 Wow I forgot that was even there, figured they would have deleted that, just skipped over it since I knew that the feedback I posted was a while ago. this is enough fb to be trusted tho
RoomScape Posted June 7, 2014 Author Posted June 7, 2014 Did anyone read my OP..? I'm not saying we have none. I'm saying increase it since it's currently too little. 2
