Um I heard that only Alek decide who can be OSD or not. For me this is kinda unfair because one person can do alot of mistakes.

My suggestion is to make all actual Official scripters to vote. More votes - less mistakes. To make it more reliable lets every vote have comment like why I vote for no/yes ( few points )

Edited May 21, 201411 yr by PolishCivil

He is my friend I vote yes!

He is my friend I vote yes!

 

That's why u need to prove why 'yes'

I agree, this would be transparent, and is used on some other forums and worked well overall.

 

Personally, I find it disgusting that devoted members like me, don't get OSD, while "Dashboard", guy who was banned for acting like a child and releasing DOX on devs, comes back and is instantly promoted. Way to go OSBot, yeyy.

That's why u need to prove why 'yes'

Cuz he helped me and is smart ty

YES

1. @PolishCivil suggested it
2. This is democracy
3. Being able to comment on applications can lead to discussion that can benefit the applicant

I think this would be a good idea, but there are issues with it too.

 

What if one OSD doesn't like that applicant?

 

I doubt everyone will stay objective and impartial, but I do like the voting idea more than just one person.

 

YES

1. @PolishCivil suggested it
2. This is democracy
3. Being able to comment on applications can lead to discussion that can benefit the applicant

 

 

@2

This is first forum i see where only few people decide what to do... This is really weird.

 

Cuz he helped me and is smart ty

 

I mean 'code' comment prove.

 

YES

1. @PolishCivil suggested it
2. This is democracy
3. Being able to comment on applications can lead to discussion that can benefit the applicant

 

 

Well, it's not really a democracy, democracy is if every member was allowed to vote. 

This is different, and better - democracy is actually a bad system. 80% of people on the earth are dumb, and two of those 80% have more right to say where a university professor should send his children, because democracy.

 

 

I think this would be a good idea, but there are issues with it too.

 

What if one OSD doesn't like that applicant?

 

I doubt everyone will stay objective and impartial, but I do like the voting idea more than just one person.

 

Alek already dislikes me, what can be worse XD (assuming since dashboard=OSD, me!=OSD)

 

Edited May 21, 201411 yr by Nitrousek

I am sure @Zach can say otherwise.

 

I don't mind the idea as long as the "higher ups" don't have a problem with that.

 

I think this would be a good idea, but there are issues with it too.

 

What if one OSD doesn't like that applicant?

 

I doubt everyone will stay objective and impartial, but I do like the voting idea more than just one person.

 

U can't prove that he's code is bad when 80% say its good.

I am sure @Zach can say otherwise.

 

I don't mind the idea as long as the "higher ups" don't have a problem with that.

 

I doubt that "higher ups" really care about it.

U can't prove that he's code is bad when 80% say its good.

 

I doubt that "higher ups" really care about it.

If that is the case, then we should have the opportunity to speak our opinion. It'd be nice if it counted more. Of course, idm if @Alek had the final say since he is the manager.

If that is the case, then we should have the opportunity to speak our opinion. It'd be nice if it counted more. Of course, idm if @Alek had the final say since he is the manager.

 

Yeh he can have final decision but he will need to prove it also. Not just saying 'NO' if we voted 75% yes.

Edited May 21, 201411 yr by PolishCivil

Yeh he can have final decision but he will need to prove it also. Not just saying 'NO' if we voted 75% yes.

I am 100% fine with that.

 

Now let's see what the others say and ultimately, the "higher ups".

support all of polishcivils suggestions, makes more sense to have all the OSD's and etc and the few scholars as well decide if someones fit for OSD or not

 

100% support for the java wizard xd