Dylan Posted February 14, 2014 Posted February 14, 2014 (edited) hopefully it will stop people like him, (annoying as fuck) hes legit grave digging really old things. Edited February 14, 2014 by Jessica Nigri
Feelmercy Posted February 14, 2014 Posted February 14, 2014 (edited) id say 300-400+ or a minimum of 30-40+ feedback to feel safer EDIT - Now I notice cowcowcowcow spamming for post count Edited February 14, 2014 by Feelmercy
Dylan Posted February 14, 2014 Author Posted February 14, 2014 id say 300-400+ or a minimum of 30-40+ feedback to feel safer i don't really want it changed, but seriously someone temp ban that idiot. 100 post is fine but if u get it in 1-2 days thats just stupid.
Faudo Posted February 14, 2014 Posted February 14, 2014 Support but in my opinion I think it should only be 250 or 300.
Administrator Maldesto Posted February 14, 2014 Administrator Posted February 14, 2014 I gave him a warning and this was his second and he can't post for 3 days. gf. 1
Oliver Posted February 14, 2014 Posted February 14, 2014 (edited) maybe not posts but positiv feedback? opinions? Edited February 14, 2014 by 0liver
Tony21412341 Posted February 14, 2014 Posted February 14, 2014 I support this. We gotta lessen scamming on this site
SuperHeadie Posted February 15, 2014 Posted February 15, 2014 Support but in my opinion I think it should only be 250 or 300. yea i think this would be fair
vinylwubsu Posted February 15, 2014 Posted February 15, 2014 i think 200 -250 posts as thats not as likely to get fast on these forums, also i hate to say it.. but I SAID GRAVEDIGGING AND SPAMMING WOULD HAPPEN ^.^