Kittens Posted October 12, 2013 Author Posted October 12, 2013 Should defiantly get added! But it'd be annoying to add it manually all the time tho. not really. there aren't too many people out there who scam and what not so it wouldn't be too much work to staff. if someones under dispute you just click their profile and add the new userbar group to their name
ScorpioZ Posted October 13, 2013 Posted October 13, 2013 Should defiantly get added! But it'd be annoying to add it manually all the time tho. not really. there aren't too many people out there who scam and what not so it wouldn't be too much work to staff. if someones under dispute you just click their profile and add the new userbar group to their name Tons of people scam dude you have no idea...
Levi Posted October 16, 2013 Posted October 16, 2013 Great idea Gh0st! This would potentionally rule out all scams from happening. However if this was implemented I think users would look to the person they're trading with and if they do not have the warning they might be encouraged to trade with them. This has advantages and disadvantages however I support this. 1
MB360 Posted October 16, 2013 Posted October 16, 2013 Should be added. People with open disputes shouldn't be allowed to trade in any case.
Kittens Posted October 24, 2013 Author Posted October 24, 2013 Great idea Gh0st! This would potentionally rule out all scams from happening. However if this was implemented I think users would look to the person they're trading with and if they do not have the warning they might be encouraged to trade with them. This has advantages and disadvantages however I support this. yea but anyone can tell that if someone has 0 feedback or only a few probably wouldnt trade with them anyway :P
Kittens Posted October 24, 2013 Author Posted October 24, 2013 or start using the warning points. what are you talking about lol....... you cant see someone elses points lmao except for mods and they give em out lol
xNeyaa Posted October 24, 2013 Posted October 24, 2013 or start using the warning points. what are you talking about lol....... you cant see someone elses points lmao except for mods and they give em out lol make em visible for anyone
Kittens Posted October 24, 2013 Author Posted October 24, 2013 or start using the warning points. what are you talking about lol....... you cant see someone elses points lmao except for mods and they give em out lol make em visible for anyone warning points are for people for excessive rule breaking lol you make no sense whatsoever. showing someones warning points wont do anything...... A trade with Caution PIP would though and make others think twice before trading with someone because they are under dispute.
HexEmporium Posted October 24, 2013 Posted October 24, 2013 Definately support this, seen it on sythe the system works well. 1
xNeyaa Posted October 25, 2013 Posted October 25, 2013 lol, if you give that PIP the person will probably make a new account, but whatever. 1
Kittens Posted October 25, 2013 Author Posted October 25, 2013 lol, if you give that PIP the person will probably make a new account, but whatever. ya new account with 0 feedback........... im sure plenty of people would trust someone with 0 feedback bro :fp:
RSBadass Posted October 26, 2013 Posted October 26, 2013 I like the concept of this idea, but I don't think it's just there yet. Maybe if somebody looked into it and had a way of perfecting it I would be supporting this. Sorry no idea on what could be done, but it's a good suggestion imo.
xNeyaa Posted October 26, 2013 Posted October 26, 2013 (edited) For people that said no - what is your reasoning? So, if someone has scammed someone, if it is with solid proof the scammer will get banned, if there isn't completely solid proof the potential scammer gets the trade with caution PIP. After that no-one will trade that person. So in both cases someone has been scammed and nobody will trade the scammer again. It does the same thing Edited October 26, 2013 by xNeyaa
beastlymaul Posted October 26, 2013 Posted October 26, 2013 For people that said no - what is your reasoning? So, if someone has scammed someone, if it is with solid proof the scammer will get banned, if there isn't completely solid proof the potential scammer gets the trade with caution PIP. After that no-one will trade that person. So in both cases someone has been scammed and nobody will trade the scammer again. It does the same thing Why not remove the pip after they're proven innocent? Like @Reaper he scammed @ScorpioZ. ScorpioZ had all the proof accept pics of the trade screens. Reaper even deleted and blocked scorpioz on skype after.... He still didn't get banned.
