Polymorphism Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 Yay or nay, that's all i need to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Explv Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 13 minutes ago, Polymorphism said: Yay or nay, that's all i need to know. If you're talking about MethodProvider.gRandom, then yes it does. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polymorphism Posted March 26, 2017 Author Share Posted March 26, 2017 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Explv said: If you're talking about MethodProvider.gRandom, then yes it does. I thought as much, just needed reassurance. Thank you sir<3 Edited March 26, 2017 by Polymorphism Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reveance Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Does gRandom works as expected for you guys? I just tested it, got unexpected result and posted a bug report but I'm kinda starting to doubt as it'd be weird that nobody would have noticed I suppose: Using MethodProvider.gRandom(600, 200) which should be based on normal distribution I got the following result: Also, the api says that the method caps the values, however I suspect that it returns all the values above the cap number as the cap number, instead of regenerating a new random. This makes the last (and first) number should up way higher than the rest 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpack Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 15 million results using gRandom(600, 200): 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reveance Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 1 minute ago, Stimpack said: 15 million results using gRandom(600, 200): Yeah this shows it much better. This isn't normal distribution but those capped values are really bad mind if I use your image in the bug report I already posted? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpack Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 1 minute ago, Reveance said: Yeah this shows it much better. This isn't normal distribution but those capped values are really bad mind if I use your image in the bug report I already posted? yeah sure, do whatever u want with it. i'm sure there's a reason the values come out like that though. let's hear from @Alek 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alek Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Adding methods like gRandom and moveMouseRandomly were a mistake. Explv answered your question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
