Been getting different responses in the cb, in terms of cpu power, banrates, etc...

Also wondering if having multiple hardcoded paths for same route would be worth it then just calling random one would be worth it.

thanks

Webwalking does increase ram/cpu usage (when walking) so if you want to make a minimal use script it is better to use a hardcoded path. In terms of anti-ban, hardcoded paths with random deviances have no more effect than the webwalker. Random paths would be a good addition to a script though.

I posted a thread related to script optimizations to reduce lag a while back. Multiple users expressed a strong opinion against webWalking, stating it uses a lot of resources and pre-defined paths are the way to go. However I remember reading (I believe it was on a thread by @Abuse) that accounts can be banned for using the same static paths. He claims that webWalking fixed the issue.

I always use static, save about 100-400mb of ram on each client