The @Override annotation is replaced by User OverRideCwalk's name

[Explv]

So this problem is recent, @@OverRideCwalk's name appears instead of the Override annotation inside of the code tags.

 

Consider this simple example:

public class Example {

    @[member='OverRideCwalk'] // This should be @ Override (no space)
    public String toString() {
        return "His username messes this up";
    }
}

People are currently working around this issue by putting a space between the @ and the annotation:

public class Example {

    @ Override
    public String toString() {
        return "This works fine";
    }
}

Edited August 2, 2016 by Explv

[Team Cape]

 

So this problem is recent, @@OverRideCwalk's name appears instead of the Override annotation.

 

Consider this simple example:

public class Example {

    @[member='OverRideCwalk'] // This should be @ Override (no space)
    public String toString() {
        return "His username messes this up";
    }
}

 

 

Is your IDE replacing it and giving you an error if you don't? I've been staring at this for like 2 minutes, and I can't decipher what you're saying the problem is bro

Edited August 2, 2016 by Imateamcape

[Explv]

Is your IDE replacing it and giving you an error if you don't? I've been staring at this for like 2 minutes, and I can't decipher what you're saying the problem is bro

 

Yeah... my uh... IDE is doing that......

 

 

The problem is, when you try to put the annotation @ Override (without the space) inside of code tags, and then submit your post / edit. @ Override is automatically replaced with that user's name. See this reply in the scripting help section:

 

http://osbot.org/forum/topic/103825-cant-get-conditionalsleep-to-validate/?p=1159828

 

Note how the accepted solution by Khaleesi has a space between the @ and Override to prevent it from happening.

Edited August 2, 2016 by Explv

[Team Cape]

Yeah... my uh... IDE is doing that

 

what do you mean it appears instead of the @override annotation? This is confusing me a lot lol

[Explv]

what do you mean it appears instead of the @override annotation? This is confusing me a lot lol

 

This thread is for the developers of the website to see, so don't worry about understanding it....

[House]

This thread is for the developers of the website to see, so don't worry about understanding it....

 

I'm actually dying laughing atm 

[Team Cape]

Just testing

@[member='OverRideCwalk']

Now i get you. If you'd made the edits that you'd just made before i would've understood though    

 

 

 

Edited August 2, 2016 by Imateamcape

[Token]

It's because of the new mention which was added a few days ago. It's time to drop the java annotation system on this forum because we have to mention people

 

PS: all your posts are notifying that user so if he is still using osbot, he will be spammed with notifications

Edited August 2, 2016 by Token

[Explv]

It's because of the new mention which was added a few days ago. It's time to drop the java annotation system on this forum because we have to mention people

 

PS: all your posts are notifying that user so if he is still using osbot, he will be spammed with notifications

 

He was last seen 2014, so I'm not too worried about spam.

 

Inb4 someone makes a new account called FunctionalInterface

[Botre]

Lel rip annotations.

 

 

Inb4 someone makes a new account called FunctionalInterface

 

[Override]

I, for one, welcome the new use of @ Override, instead of @Override.

Edited August 2, 2016 by Override

[Explv]

I, for one, welcome the new use of @ Override, instead of @@Override.

No