Jump to content

Ricky

Trade With Caution
  • Posts

    2034
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    99.5%

Posts posted by Ricky

  1. Reasons why a restricted market is seen as "good"

    1. Established scripters make more money
    2. Gold farmers make more money
    3. Customer don't have to think

     

    I personally don't think the three reasons above justify a switch to a restricted market.

    Although scripters like coding, isn't the main reason why most of us are here is for money...? Thats just my opinion tho

  2. I tried fighting this battle already, didn't go very far. Do you know how many of "Johnny's Boot Buyer" or "Sammy's Cow Killer" I wanted to deny? Also a while back I proposed price ceilings and caps for scripts, which were denied by rambling 14 year olds who learned about their (American) Constitutional rights 3 hours ago in History class.

     

    Local Scripts, yeah.. Not checking/managing them on that scale.

     

    You have a point on local scripts.....Theres too many of the same scripts on the sdn :/

    blast furnace please <3

  3. I'm not sure what this would accomplish, free scripts for anything should be allowed. Sure, it make ruin some methods or scripter sales, but life is generally not fair.

    Thats true, but some methods should actually be preserved and kept at a stable rate instead of being leeched to fuck and causing the paying users to receive less profit..

  4. I'd say up it to tree fiddy

     

    I came along & bought a bunch of bonds to support my gold farm, you got a problem m8?

     

    But I do agree that it could be increased.

    Yeah but what about those people who buy 1-2 at a time and get aton of feedback. they come back in less than 14 days for another 1-2 feedback. It adds up.

  5. I didn't have an issue with this but the way your defending it makes me want to rethink everything. First off, verified is a pointless title given to people who do trades worth 2 to 3 dollars. It's pretty easy to sell bonds and get 25+ feedback in a day, I've seen it happen before. Scams are going to occur whether they're verified or not and I don't think raising the feedback to 200 will help. I wouldn't say 500 would help either. I think it would be a select few people who have really displayed a great attitude, and also great services on their time in osbot. Here I say, no person who sold bonds for majority of there feedback should be verified unless they have a lot high valued feedback also. Hypothetically, I would give BawsZ, Divica, and Probemas verified. Debate users like Cinnamon and Roomscape. 

     

    An easy way we whole bond seller guy feedback farm is add another option to the feedback plugin. Add an option to put "Worth" in for the trade. It is a mandatory option, it will show how much gp was risked etc. I know there could be issues with it but I think it'd be better than a lot of other options. 

    Agreed! Bond trades are a max of $10 trades. Most of my fb is gold and I'm proud of it. Its pretty bs how some guy comes along selling $2-3 worth of bonds at a time and gets a shitload of feedback.

    • Like 2
  6. If the free script is made first, then why would you remove it if a premium script is made just like it?

    I agree on some points, but strongly disagree with others. Maybe make premium scripts have a minimum standard that you must be able to meet around the clock, but to flat out say "only some people should make scripts durrhurr". A community will never grow in a place where people are only considerate of themselves and of people at their skill level. I plan to release premium scripts in the future once I get better and learn more. The fact that I'm new shouldn't prevent me or others from being able to make scripts.

     

     

    tl;dr. Penalizing people due to them not being on the same skill level as you is stupid, especially if they're trying to learn.

    Alright. Let's say you make a premium script for woodcutting(just an example). Some new guy comes along, makes a badass woodcutter that is better than yours for free. Isn't that a dick move? 

×
×
  • Create New...