Jump to content

Satire

Scripter I
  • Posts

    416
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    100%

Everything posted by Satire

  1. As Khaleesi said, it doesn't really matter what IDE you pick because it doesn't improve much. I personally use Eclipse and Intellij (on and off). If you're a new comer, I'd suggest intellij since the UI is more user friendly and can be less confusing than intellij. Just pick a suitable IDE that you like because it all comes down to personal preference. The commonly known IDE's for Java is Intellij, Eclipse and Netbeans.
  2. I swear that's only cause they manually check the accs. Suicide bot on weekends, there are like 0 bans lmao.
  3. Java does not have such a thing as It's a higher level language. Just declare it as a (public)static final and boom, there you go Reason: Java doesn't have a precompiler. I know it will be annoying to wrap your head around but eventually, you'll get used to it. You could make your own version of it using classes and all, but it won't make any difference since the won't preprocess it anyway...
  4. I'm unsure about that dude. I haven't been banned on quite a lot of accounts but all of a sudden after reporting myself, I get banned? This could be a coincidence or could not be. I'm sure they look at every report they get (they might have a system that can automatically analyze what they've done in a time frame and give an estimate if it was a bot or not). But there is no way they'd only check it out if a certain spot receives a lot of reports. Because with that logic, you can just go to the end of runescape where nobody ever goes to and start killing rats or whatever 24/7. The only thing that we can not know is if we get banned by the system or not. Just because it says in the message that the system banned you (it could just be there to tip off people) so they can't actually tell if it was a human or program that banned them. This topic is very debatable but who knows. I'm just reporting what I had witnessed with my account.
  5. I'm taking a benefit of the doubt here. I had botted it with 100% supervision and nobody was in any of the areas that I was in when I was botting. But If there was, the script would auto hop worlds(this was p2p so there are areas were it's almost empty). I can't say for certain that nobody reported me but the chances of that are highly unlikely. But for sure, it's a valid question that I cannot give a definitive answer to.
  6. I reported myself on an acc I botted on for a full week and then played legit for 2 days(for like 1 hour/day, ain't got time 2 play legit wtf). The results will shock you (not), I got banned So don't think your safe if you previously botted and are now playing legit. I'd have to think you'd need to play for quite a long time, to hide your previous "botting patterns". So reports do count and you get banned if 1 person reports you. Just keep that in mind (if you haven't already).
  7. It's pretty simple really. Just implement stop(); and that'll do the trick. You'll never have to worry about being banned ever again! But in all seriousness, .interact will always click in "random" places. It won't always click the same position each time. So you don't have to worry about it. But if you really wanted to, you could use rectangle mouse destination or just make a rectangle in the area and click a random position from that rectangle with getMouse.click(x,y) but it will do the same job as it already does. If you think this will prevent bans, it won't. Trust me :p
  8. Read up on constructors. You need to pass the scripts instance to every class that needs to use it.
  9. Remove getMouse().moveRandomly(). This has been removed since a very long time ago. The logger even tells you the exact line it's on (118). Just delete the whole line.
  10. I can't say but there's still something a tad bit off. Not sure if it's because the sliver/grey color is too bright or because something changed when the forum was updated and I just can't figure out what. Thankfully you restored most of it back to its original state.
  11. 100% agree. This theme looks so terrible. It's worse than the default myBB theme and we all know what myBB's default theme looks like!
  12. Already gone with deceiver and we'll see what happens. Thanks for the recommendation though.
  13. If you're a graphics artist and are interested, give me a price or add me on skype (akbar.io) for more details. I'm looking for someone who's willing to finish it within 2-3 days.
  14. I just called my mate who works at Jagex, expect their lawyer to be at your house by the end of tomorrow.
  15. So when someone quoted me a link to this https://Advertising other bots isn't allowed..org/forums/topic/42469-playing-legit-on-a-botted-account-using-the-osbuddy-client-might-put-you-at-risk/ I found it rather strange that it took me to the actual website. So then I quoted the link and double clicked it, needless to say that there's a bug. The link text gets changed to "Advertising other bots isn't allowed" but the actual URL itself stays unmodified. Allowing you to link to blacklisted websites without a problem. Just thought I'd let you guys knows -I'm not a snitch, Keepo.
  16. That's what I thought lol. Yea, you won't get banned at all. Jagex can obviously tell if it's Osbuddy or not and Needless to say that I have played legit on osbot before too. You won't get banned unless you actually bot within the client. What counts as botting? AHK scripts Macros and mouse clickers Some people do get away with minor ahk scripts (that help with right clicking certain options fast) but if you play legit without macros or ahk scripts and you use osbuddy, you will be fine. If you use konduit, you will be fine. If you use any client for that matter, you will be fine. If you don't bot, you won't get banned. I haven't been banned playing on osbot and I had a 2 day ban back in 2014. I can tell you that Jagex's system is quite advanced and I've yet to see a ban for someone playing on any client legit. Just make sure not to bot and I guarantee that you will not be banned if you don't bot. Just disregard what that post says, it's outdated. There have been a lot more upgrades to their system since then.
  17. Really? My ban meter has stayed the same since 2014 lol.
  18. Aah, I thought he said he got banned for botting and if it was okay to use it (without botting and without getting banned). I guess I just missread what he meant.
  19. Osbuddy has a lot more features than the official client. But fuck osbuddy, Konduit is way better. Get half of the paid shit from osbuddy for free. You also don't have the shady devs like osbuddy's devs, most of them came from a hacking and luring background...
  20. Yes he is. Quite unfortunate, no idea who he is. But I was told that he was compromised and you shouldn't trust him until the mods can verify it's actually him. Hope this gets resolved soon.
  21. I took a look at the code and it should run perfectly fine for everything. I also ran it for 3 hours using a firestaff. It's possible that it could be the staff but I'm using the api to check if you have the runes. So there's a problem with the staff or something? Its hard to tell. Since I cannot replicate it and I don't have members atm to check. But it works fine for me at monk of zammy. I'm sorry, unless you can replicate it 100% there's nothing much I can do about it. I could make my own spell checker and all that (which was what the very old version had) but I removed it since the api had it already. Not sure if anyone else had this problem with the newer version of the script.
  22. Could you please tell me what spell you were using? Cause I'm home and will be testing (I'm just hoping its a low level spell). EDIT: Also can you tell me what staff u used? (If any)
  23. This doesn't show anything lol... How do I know you didn't actually run out of runes or something a like. You ran it for 60mins perfectly fine. Nonetheless, I'll take a look at it when I get home and see what the problem is.
×
×
  • Create New...