true why not use numbers. lets say theres 500-800 players each world roughly so we'll even it out at 650 each world and it drops to 150-450 after an update that stops us all from botting round it to 300
42700 bots on at each given time (dat shit blows my mind) - 2700 randoms that will just jump off when logged out for an update that might fudge the numbers (plus id rather work with a nice number)
40k bots even with a team of 8, youre right, thats hella difficult
but the thing is 30k will be farming, realistically probably 35k but im happy with an ez number again
farms are full of easily detected easily chain banned accs that all have links to each other by whatever means, I wouldn't know too much in this area as I bot casually but judging by the forum posts these are all automated bans that get a brief check before being permed without hesitation so lets take 1 man from the team of 8 and say hes dedicated to manually review these mass bans even if he had a hand from another there would still be 6 left to deal with the casuals
6 people to manually check up on acc's spat out to them from some bot busting algorithm we are yet to determine. (lets say... the overall time that week, too heavily scheduled play times maybe too unscheduled (night time botting), ip change, ip sharing, over a certain amount of macro reports, maybe the qp to lvl ratio) who knows?
but using the math we have been there's only 10k acc's between 6 people, however there's 24 hours in a day and there're bots that are offline, that's a bad sample now, so ill bump it to 40k splitting each acc into 6 hr a day intervals
anyway tho 40k casuals that aren't as easily banned, most of em will bot safe id say 30k have been around long enough to know what works for them, 10k are fucking clueless and put themselves in line to be manually reviewed bc the algorithm flagged them , 6 people vs a list of 10k accs in a day. 1 person vs 1.7k flagged bots for the day. lets say at jagex they work an 8 hr shift. lets go back to the original argument and say they manually go over each bot (how long does it take us to identify a script? 1-2 mins?) you'd be ignorant af to think they havnt done there homework on all the scripts on the market, id say they can probably identify a bot in the same ammount of time as us if not less. so lets break 8 hrs into mins 8x60=480 bans done manually watching screens and making judgment calls on 2 day bans or perms. that would be roughly a 1/4 of the day's target of 1.7k shortlisted bans each.
but is it really that far-fetched to think that maybe 2880/10000 manual bans get dished out a day? maybe the other 7120 get a strike by there name that easily puts them closer to the top of the list next time the algorithm accuses them of botting.
it would explain the roll of the dice type of feeling linked to heavy botting that you would think you'd get banned for (some survive some dont). don't rule out what is still feasible. i mean whos to say this doesn't happen. you've worked at jagex no? ....
dismissing this is counterproductive unless its been proven otherwise, the conspiracy still stands strong and doesn't need someone with influence debunking it. this is just my 2 cents on the possible reasoning that mouse recorders never get banned, bc whos gon watch a human-like movement four 30 mins tryna find the loop? they'd run this alleged client detector on the acc and it would come up clean. im by no means smarter than the next mans and dont claim to be, in fact ive been blazed all morning and couldnt even punctuate this reply if i tried, and maybe nothing i said will make sense tomorrow but its 4:30 am over here and i feel woke rn.
ba dum tisss