RoomScape

I don't think you need sponsor to be a regular MM. And I don't see the need for posts for VMM?

I think it's removed for a reason lol. But yeah, shouldn't have removed it because there is no mm at the moment.

Like I said before, you assume to much. That's not how much I make, first off. Secondly, all you said was that it's a monopoly that I wanted to control the market or something along those lines. Not much else.

I do think that is a bit much. I personally wouldn't give @Maldesto my photo ID so he can jerk off. And how, exactly, is my idea restricting the market from growing?

It's not a monopoly, though. You keep spitting the same bs over and over and it's getting annoying to read.

It wasn't meant to be a contest. @Final somehow assumes that I make as little money as he does and NEEDS this forum to survive living with my parents and paying for my noodles to eat. Which is why he thinks I'm doing all of this to make a few gold coins in an online gaming site to pay for said noodles.

Exactly, which is why I don't get why you're mad if I charge a fee for a SERVICE. PS: Just to shut you up a little bit. I don't care about making a few gold pieces off of a middleman trade. http://prntscr.com/f0phal

You're a scripted and you're trying to think that a middleman is the same when it simply is not.

Ignorance is bliss. Try doing research before trying to talk shit. :p I'm sure you are with your scripture rank, six feedbacks and one year old forum account.

I'm an evil guy who is going to charge 15% for every trade I MM. If that's true and they hate me so much for it, shouldn't that encourage them to be a verified middleman faster so that they can be free for the benefit of the forum?

What I do is none of your business. Try worrying about yourself and what you should be doing instead of obsessing over what others may be doing. I don't bother to care what others do. I do what I need to do to better myself. I don't look at what others do and try to complain about how they're making money or how they're doing something better than me. I do things to the best of my ability and that's it. I'm where I'm at because I do things without worrying about how others are and instead spend that wasted energy on my own business. Also, there are other people with more feedback than me and with around the same middleman feedback. Edit: Again, the same goes for you. If you believe I'm doing this to make money then I'm sorry. If that's the case, you should strive even harder to be a verified middleman so you can be a free verified middleman to save the entire forum from my wrath and expensive fees, right? Be the good guy. I don't mind being the bad guy.

A middleman is unlike everything you've mentioned. Also, I would like you to find the last time I have charged someone to be their middleman. I've been a middleman since 2010 and I believe I've been free for about 6 out of those years. The entire time I've been on OSBot I've been a free middleman and verified middleman. Please try to at least know your facts before you shit some bs out of your mouth. If you think I'm lying, please. Find me a time where I charged someone. I will send you $50 right now if you can prove it. Lastly, I want this because this is best for the site. If you don't believe that then I'm sorry. There's not much else I can say to you at that point to dissuade you so I'll end it with that.

I get your point, which is exactly why I said it's difficult to dictate accounts, lol. As it is, any noob can make an account and sell to scam, but then if you make it too strict then no one will be able to sell accounts. It's just weird. I'm honestly ok with anything goes in the account section and just making a big ass thread disclosing that you can get scammed by anyone selling accounts regardless of what anyone says. People are stupid and will find a way to get scammed regardless of how many restrictions we enforce on accounts which is why I feel like just leaving it be to be honest. Edit: Maybe limit the number of accounts that can be sold at a time?

Here's what I would like to see happen: Requirements to be a middleman: Six month old forum account. 50 unique feedbacks - multiple from the same person won't count. No open scam report. ----- Requirements to be a Verified Middleman: One year old forum account. 250 unique feedbacks - 150 of which should be from middleman trades (75 transactions). A forum rank - Sponsor/Donor. No open scam reports and no scam reports stating that the user has scammed. Proof of trades above a certain value - screenshots required as proof. Acceptance by the general community as a trusted user worthy of the verified rank - can be staff only judgement but can have users who vouch separately for the users trust Must not have a scam report where someone lost the dispute due to the middleman negligence nor a scam report due to the middleman not properly verifying themselves. ----- To be a verified middleman, they should make a forum thread sort of like an application where people can vouch for their trust. This would also be an opportunity for anyone who would object to their verified status. This should be flexible and anyone can claim to have been scammed without needing concrete proof. I do understand that some people can fake this but this should be included as a lot of new people get scammed and don't have sufficient evidence as they're new and stupid. There should also be vote by staff to determine if they're worthy of the verified rank. The middleman should post screenshots of their trades showing that they know what they're doing and that they've been trusted with certain amounts.

Not trying to totally bash you guys or tell say you're not doing your part. Just think market rules regarding spam need to be a little stricter. Like what? Accounts is a touchy subject due to the nature of it. It's hard to regulate it but soo much and even then, there can be false claims.

I'm guessing 'dig for offenses' is something that other people say mods do? If so, you're a mod. Do your part. Ignore what others have to say. People will always find a reason to complain about one thing or another. As long as you're doing what's right then it doesn't matter what they think. Also, what's wrong with digging for offenses? Isn't that what mods are for? If you permanent ban someone for saying that they're going to chargeback then that's just stupid. If you warn or something then that's totally different.

Maybe. I think I suggested this in the past and it was turned down though. I see people saying they're going to chargeback and stuff whenever someone tries to buy a large amount. Not saying that they're legit or anything but it's not always needed.

Wrong section. This is only for forum suggestions. Not info on botting scripts.

If the members actually follow the rules then you wouldn't be mod. There would be no need for you at that point.

Would be ok if you can only receive fb once a week from any one person? Right now I believe it's 24h? But do mods go through market on a regular basis? It's not very reassuring to know that it's only removed upon report.

Please do. It's ridiculous. Also, though it's not as common, people go around posting good luck with selling or some similar bs which is not technically included in the rules I believe.

I'm sure that person would love it but it's not fair to everyone else. I'm not saying he doesn't want it. I'm saying it shouldn't be allowed because then everyone will go spam threads with that and it's completely unnecessary.

Does the rule include people posting @RoomScape in every thread? That's annoying to see also.

Why suggest people for services if they didn't ask for recommendations? If they ask for it that's something different but I don't ever see that. People just go in and post. If sysm is that interested I'm sure he'd be able to see the thread himself or have his thread bumped where people can see it easily.

There are tons of ways to get vouches besides selling accounts.