Zappa

Pavel Datsyuk has better English:

You are right that it does, but your proof is incorrect. 9/9 can not be .999.. if it also equals 1. Let X = 0.999... Then 10X = 9.999... Subtract X from each side to give us: 9X = 9.999... - X but we know that X is 0.999..., so: 9X = 9.999... - 0.999... or: 9X = 9 Divide both sides by 9: X = 1 X = 0.999... = 1 Therefore 0.999... = 1 That's like saying when my eyes are blue and yours are brown that: Eyes = Blue Eyes = Brown Blue = Brown Two different numbers can never be the same number, whatever flawed mathematical formulas you will use for it. I've read that explanation before and I'm sure that's technically the correct mathemetical answer, but it's just bullshit. Simple logic is that two different numbers are not the same number. Simple logic also shows us that there is no 'infinite' so this entire theory is an empty shell. Also, to give a reply which is someone on the same wave length: 10x = 9,9999... 9x= 9 8x = 9 - 0,999999.... 8x = ????????? Explain that one to me. Flawed method... if 10x = 9.999... then 9x ≠ 9 That's your own flawed method I quoted mate. *sigh* You missed the entire middle steps, you went from step 1 to step 4 lol

Just made my own world hopping method - updating now

You are right that it does, but your proof is incorrect. 9/9 can not be .999.. if it also equals 1. Let X = 0.999... Then 10X = 9.999... Subtract X from each side to give us: 9X = 9.999... - X but we know that X is 0.999..., so: 9X = 9.999... - 0.999... or: 9X = 9 Divide both sides by 9: X = 1 X = 0.999... = 1 Therefore 0.999... = 1 That's like saying when my eyes are blue and yours are brown that: Eyes = Blue Eyes = Brown Blue = Brown Two different numbers can never be the same number, whatever flawed mathematical formulas you will use for it. I've read that explanation before and I'm sure that's technically the correct mathemetical answer, but it's just bullshit. Simple logic is that two different numbers are not the same number. Simple logic also shows us that there is no 'infinite' so this entire theory is an empty shell. Also, to give a reply which is someone on the same wave length: 10x = 9,9999... 9x= 9 8x = 9 - 0,999999.... 8x = ????????? Explain that one to me. Flawed method... if 10x = 9.999... then 9x ≠ 9 And about the eye thing, you are completely wrong there because in my formula, x was a constant. In yours, the variable Eyes is not. So that is a logical fallacy.

The church? What are you talking about?

If you do not understand what I mean in the title then just ignore this post. I would recommend reading Bertrand Russell's History of Western Philosophy (or listening to the audio version of it which is available on YouTube). It's quite comprehensive, easy to read (as philosophy goes), and will probably get you thinking in ways you haven't before. Most of the chapters give some biographical information, a summary of important philosophical ideas, and will show how they fit into the rest of the history of Western thought. Russell has is own views and is quite critical of almost everyone he covers; however, should you find any of the philosophers he covers to be particularly interesting, you can ditch the Russell and go read their writings for yourself. Here are Descartes, Locke, and Hume. I suspect you might find them of interest, but if not, there are many other chapters to look at.

Apparently the quote flew right over your head.

In The Gay Science section 125, The Madman; Friedrich Nietzsche first stated the iconic phrase, "God is Dead". "God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?” This is probably one of the most true quotes that still applies today. God is dead.

this Incorrect, you are forgetting that numbers are made up. According to our number system and our math system, 0.999... = 1. View my proof above.

Like I keep saying over and over, there are some things I can not fix right now. It is an issue with the client that the admins need to address.

I just heard that the worldHopper is broken from the last update (pvp worlds). So I will get rid of world hopping until the admins fix it (maybe never)...

You are right that it does, but your proof is incorrect. 9/9 can not be .999.. if it also equals 1. Let X = 0.999... Then 10X = 9.999... Subtract X from each side to give us: 9X = 9.999... - X but we know that X is 0.999..., so: 9X = 9.999... - 0.999... or: 9X = 9 Divide both sides by 9: X = 1 X = 0.999... = 1 Therefore 0.999... = 1

Not very high, but not low either. Fairly moderate. J-Mods like to go to green dragons once in a while, which is why I added an option to world hop when they do come near.

Not at all... It was flawless up until recently when the admins started to neglect the client.

That is not my script lol

How can I update it when: -The client is not working and; -None of the methods in the API are working

I refunded him

Yes

skype: smdBeastyMaul

Where did I agree to a TOS stating that if he gets his account locked I am responsible. How do you know that he did not re-sell it and then it got locked?

You do not have the rights to see the evidence because the account belongs to them and not you.

Next big update is set for sometime this week - includes 2 new dragon killing locations!

You must assist him in receiving the account back. Jagex will likely be contacting you since it is your account. Either you recover the account / assist him in doing so, and then give it to him, or you refund him. Going back to the analogy, OSBot is the drug dealer. You're a supplier of us. We suspect you to make sure the drugs arrive safely to our customers. When I sold him the account I changed all of the info to his - so Jagex can not contact me. I also did give him all the info I got in order to recover the account (It was not my account originally). And expanding on your take for the analogy. I did deliver the drugs safely - he just got caught with them.

I argue that I am not responsible for a refund. This trade was an illegal trade of property that belonged to neither of us, and as a trade that is against Jagex terms of service, he is well aware of the risk he takes when making a trade of this nature. I am not at fault here. I traded him the account, Jagex noticed that the account had been traded - which is illegal, and they took action. Gorilla is just as at fault as I am because I am the drug dealer, and he is the drug user. I argue that because he knew that the trade was against Jagex terms of service, and that he knew that the account may be locked as a result of this trade, then I do not owe him a refund. The case would have been different if I had tried to recover the account, but I did not, and he can not prove that I tried to.

Was just about to post this. Cheers though!