Saiyan

Last chance. You really think i'm favouring the guy? we're going on based on facts not assumptions. He gained 1m exp and the agreed price was 6gp exp. That's a fact. What also is a fact is that you gave him a specific password and he knew the bank pin that's another fact. However, this is the assumption(s): 1) He took the items 2) You took the items 3) A 3rd party on your end took the items 4) A 3rd party on his end took the items Now, pay him 6m by monday or get banned for scamming 6m...

My logic is on point, yours is not. That dispute was SETTLED. We cant prove who took the items, just because you ordered from someone else doesn't rule out the fact that you didn't take your own items this time. Like I said, you pay him for what he did. If you do not pay 6m by monday you'll just get banned.

Bot is probably down I assume?

Ok and with that logic we can also argue that: 1) You took the items and muled them off 2) Who's not to say someone took the items on your other account? You can't prove that. It works both ways. Literally, it could have been you or it could have been him. Now like I said we're all sorry that you lost your items, but he gained 1m exp and he must be paid for it.

We concluded in the last dispute that no party was responsible for the items that went missing. There's literally no way we can pin this on either of you because then it would be biased and unjust. Who said he's going to get a full service refund? He only did 1m exp. why would he get paid for something that he didn't do? You agreed on 6gp exp so that means you owe him 6m osrs you have until Sunday to decide and pay back.

The evidence you provided is not sufficient enough to prove that Dynamite is this 'Ahmed'. 1) The person on skype claimed to be him. Anyone can claim to be someone doesn't mean it's actually them. I.e someone on a blacklisted skype could claim to be decode but that doesnt necessarily mean it actually is decode. 2) If it really was him you should have waited for the PM saying yes it's me on skype that would have been solid proof. For this reason, i'm going to remove the TWC. We've found the person that it most likely is. @@Ahm3dwaris and his good multi account friend Ahm3dw Both have been IP banned.

It doesnt prove that he owns the account though? I mean anyone could claim to be him on skype. Let me discuss with the staff and i'll get back with you on this

You agreed on 6GP/Exp? You wont be paid for the full service so I request Daweed to pay you 6M osrs as u only got him 1m exp 1m * 6 = 6m Asked daweed to respond.

Placed him in TWC for now. I might have overlooked something but his OSBot says his skype is live:thomas_paulsens or something.

TWC will remain whilst we are checking up on something.

Sorry for your loss, archived.

Has until 10:40am GMT to respond, seeing as that was when he was notified.

Placed him in TWC and asked him to respond

Oh ok :P

He has 3 more hours to grow some balls and post on this dispute before he gets banned.

Next sdn script? Ideas P.S pls be reasonable

NPC zombie = getNpcs().getAll().stream().filter(npc -> npc.getHealthPercent() > 0 && !npc.isUnderAttack() && npc.getName().equals("Zombie").findFirst().orElse(null); if(zombie != null && !myPlayer().isUnderAttack()) { zombie.interact("Attack"); cond sleep } This was made without an IDE so it may have some errors :P but im sure you could easily fix the typo errors.

Regardless, he should at least post on this dispute and acknowledge that he accidentally lost your CW top and he would arrange something with you to amend it. Instead, he's not bothering to visit this dispute at all.

xd

b4 you auth ppl ask me to quickly check

Has Adnane been paid yet?

What makes you say that? Lol, a zulrah ready acc is like what 60-75m no way is a literal max main 125m how much vouches and fb has he got on sythe?