Dex

User banned, he indeed edited the thread afterwards and the 20M unit price wasn't on his thread before. Feel free to chargeback the $9.50.

That is not one of our tasks.

Thought so, unfortunately you have been scammed by an imposter. I'm sorry for your loss.

Can you post a screenshot of the Skype ID please? Click his profile and screenshot the ID with the conversation in the background.

If this was discussed over Skype surely you can still get some kind of evidence about that? If you can't I'm afraid we will have to close and archive this.

@M1tch has been banned, I'm sorry for your loss.

User has been notified of the dispute and is requested to reply here.

Seems to have been resolved by now if I'm correct?

@Zach made the new chatbox. Css is something that can be improved but it functions properly and that's what's the most important for now.

I used to be until I discovered Android.

Traded in one halo, now I have all 3 of them and tickets left to save for decorative.

Removed.

Thanks but we are aware. He'll stay in TWC. He never actually scammed anyone so he's not going to be banned.

We got the evidence accompanied by an explanation as to why he refused to pay you the 35m, and after reviewing it, it turns out that he was infact correct, he didn't owe you anything, you just didn't understand or didn't want to understand it and kept pushing him even after he was banned. Meaning the ban was unjustified. I would be very mad too and do supid shit if that happened to me. And for that he will stay in TWC.

Yes way, I was as surprised as you are. GUYS YOU WON'T BELIEVE THIS

http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=8136190 I didn't really read that, this was just first on Google.

Dear OSBot community, Since we migrated to IPB4 there have been a lot of issues with the bump topic plugin. One of the major issues was that the plugin only allowed people to bump one of their topics in a specified interval via settings in the acp. So to bypass this, we have been allowing people to bump their topics by posting "bump" on them. To resolve these issues we decided to allow posting to bump topics, and to avoid confusion we also decided to entirely remove the bump button. We soon realised that we didn't really have any specific set of rules in place for bumping since we used to be able to directly apply restrictions to the bump button. From now on, this will however change. I have discussed with the staff team what kind of restrictions were applied to the bump button when we still had ipb3, and we came to the mutual agreement to apply the following restrictions from now on: Non paid ranks: every 6 hours (including Ex-staff and Scripter) VIP: every 4 hours All other paid ranks: every 3 hours These restrictions apply per seperate topic that someone creates. Keep in mind that the timer to be able to bump your topic starts running from the last time that you posted on your own topic. Another thing there is still some confusion about is if workers are allowed to bump the topic of the service owner. Let it be clear once and for all that they are NOT allowed to do that, only the creator of the topic is allowed to bump his own topic! We also know these rules can easily be broken and that we obviously can't go through every topic to check if people are following these rules, so I would like to encourage everyone to report the post when you see someone breaking these rules and a staff member will take action accordingly. These changes are effective immediately when this topic is posted, I will edit the market rules later on with this new information. Sincerely, The OSBot staff team

We're still working out the rules regarding that since we need to make clear regulations as to what is allowed. For now you're allowed to post to bump yes.

The bump button hook for ipb4 is completely fucked. We're going to be removing it soon.

Nice concept and very clean presentation! You have improved a lot lately.

Idk how you think I promoted him.

1. We can only restrict namechanges based on the current rank someone has. If there's a hook to set restrictions based on a rank that someone previously had then we can do it, but I doubt there is something like that. 2. As stated above, you can already check previous names.

I believe I said WE promoted him, do you really think I make those decisions on my own? And sure I never come in the chatbox but there are chatbox assistants and moderators who are in there very often. In addition to that, we do have the ability to check chatbox logs which we usually do before we promote chatbox assitants. Also, it's very easy to suggest me 5 more competent CBA's right now, after he got banned for scamming... But where were you when we promoted Jamez, I can't recall getting a pm from you with those suggestions? (keep in mind the timezones those people live in if you do that next time) As for the second statement, anyone who is not illiterate has the ability to read what is stated on the pips. I believe when those were created we put the words on the pip, in addition to that the name of the rank is also stated on their profile. I've never heard of anyone complaining about the fact that the pips were too similar, in fact they're not similar at all right now so even for illiterate people the difference is clearly visible. But if you have any suggestions for what we should do to make it clear to both illiterate and colorblind people, feel free to post it here: https://osbot.org/forum/forum/148-forum-feedbacksuggestions/ I would like to say something else to you, you seem to hate on everything the staff has to say or every decision or change that we make, somehow you're always involved. Do you have issues with authority figures or are you just someone who likes to complain about everything? If you have proper suggestions to improve things around these forums I would very much like to hear them, but also keep in mind that we have the whole community to take into account and not just the opinion of one man. In addition to that, in some situations we're limited to what our forum software is able to offer us.

We try, but obviously mistakes can happen.

I have requested @Mikasa to reply here. Is there any other evidence that you are able to provide us? Possibly the thread where the account sale was advertised or the skypelogs of the trade? Was he the original owner?