Takeoff

srsly..no

http://www.ibtimes.com/us-air-force-drops-record-amount-bombs-against-islamic-state-iraq-syria-1777616 60% of bombings by the US Air force where the other 40% are from the US Navy, Marines and ALL other members of the coalition, combined.

In comparison to the US, hardly. edit ; but that is not your fault, but Obama's failed attempts to maintain a coalition

assuming they all are on different IPs, yes it's really the only thing you can do, that is if you are willing to risk your main

http://puu.sh/gMqbo/f49530b71a.png it's a generalization pain..come on also i'm not trying to defend this guy don't get me wrong

i mean like are you arab?

because the KKK is mostly mid 40 white guys, not people from the middle east.. if you consider rsgp has a $ value, it is basically a real world transaction, and even if not he is promoting ones business by utilizing the services

In my expierence RWT bans are very rare, it is xferring the items from goldfarming accounts to the mule that is the most dangerous

well his bias is understandable, considering ISIS and all..but is there any truth to it in the first place?

Certain things are worthy of bots, some not so much

Those frogs are like the rock crabs of F2P, if you want to train in f2p they are a great option.

lol true but nothing wrong with a nicer community is there?

Great

Yea my post was mostly pertaining to those with 70+ defence. If Shakur's down to make it for you, best of luck dude was just voicing my concerns

Well for the reason of it being so popular, it is a hot spot, especially now as weath is going ham on NMZ hosters, so expirements may honestly be a wiser choice, especially since you can 6 hour afk NMZ assuming guthans

I'm guessing he means for F2P, and if so the deposit box on port sarim is the most efficient method to bank, as powerfishing lobsters makes 0 sense.

@Ares , my friend just sent me this http://gyazo.com/73f99c402bb3500beb2cbb405bf52f22 maybe it's because your scripts are bad

Sorry but this has to be the most pointless request. I understand banks can be big, but wouldn't you rather organize it once to your personal preference rather than let a script dictate your bank? Plus it's just extremely lazy to want to bot this.. btw are you stan from Thomas' site?

Well actually I guess if you look at the internet as an anonymous way to voice your feelings/opinions, it makes sense for people to feel comfortable speaking their minds without hesitation, but imo that doesn't mean it is the right thing

That is a pretty dick move of you..

Lol i was being sarcastic since you requested us not to ask, uhmm if you are just starting out, maybe something simple-ish, but also beneficial, like unicows or something

http://vocaroo.com/i/s1iYWpYctlbT

Sure the model may not be the best for keeping a cyclical market, but for the customers that already exist, advertising is how to attract them. His signature is a good start though. But that is a good point for the non existing recurrent payments, less money over time - for both scripters & devs. I wonder why they changed the system, considering scripts usually require some form of upkeep, no matter how small. There was probably more people canceling payments before the next month, or being turned off from buying, assuming there was no way to stop monthly payments. It would seem fair to maybe lower the initial cost, and make monthly payments mandatory, but if the above is a reason for stopping it, then I guess it makes sense to do lifetime with a higher initial cost vs lower monthly cost. edit; imo that's not the only way to make money off scripts. You could make a script better than an existing one, and those who need it may feel obliged to buy it. I've done this many times.

This, besides risking your gear and chins with a faulty script, not to mention a ban.

These forums are so full of people who think so negatively. Even if that is your perception of one's post, why further your misguided view and be passive aggressive, furthering the non-existent negativity? By this I mean try to think, or at least post positively despite what you think the other person is saying.