client.blahblah

[Guest Apogee]

For OSBot 1:

client.getSkills().getLevel(Skill HUNTER);

For OSBot 2:

getSkills().getStatic(Skill HUNTER); // This returns the player's TRUE level.

getSkills().getDynamic(Skill HUNTER); // This returns the players temp level.  (The level on the left that is affected by pots/drains)

int currenthp = getSkills().getDynamic(Skill HITPOINTS);

int HPlevel = getSkills().getStatic(Skill HITPOINTS); 

int halfofhp = (getSkills().getStatic(Skill HITPOINTS) / 2);

if (currenthp <= halfofhp) {
     // eat
}

I did not leave out "client" on accident. 

You don't use it anymore for things like this. Hopefully this helps somebody out there.

Edited May 14, 2014 by Bitter

[Dog_]

skills.getStatic(Skill.HUNTER)

skills.getDynamic(Skill.HUNTER)

[Kenneh]

God, osbot 2 is worse than I thought. Not a huge improvement.

[Guest Apogee]

God, osbot 2 is worse than I thought. Not a huge improvement.

 

 

It's simply more efficient, or at least it WILL be when it's all there.

[NotoriousPP]

It's simply more efficient, or at least it WILL be when it's all there.

 

Not at all, please study programming languages before making claims like this.

 

This new API is a step back as far as I'm concerned.

[Ericthecmh]

Not at all, please study programming languages before making claims like this.

 

This new API is a step back as far as I'm concerned.

 

I must agree. Some parts are better, but they took out some things that just made me shake my head.

[Guest Apogee]

Not at all, please study programming languages before making claims like this.

 

This new API is a step back as far as I'm concerned.

 

 

I wasn't referring to scripting. I was talking about performance.

[Swizzbeat]

Work on your naming conventions.

[senkido]

this is sad to hear.