D Bolter Posted July 25, 2019 Posted July 25, 2019 Disputed Member:@aliraj Why it should be removed: #1 I don't know exactly what he's disputing, I already told him im working on a fix #2 I've already offered him a refund in the past and also gave him a complimentary proxy Details: proof I offered to refund: where i gave him a free proxy: apparently i ignored him because he kept asking the same questions and he also messaged me in the middle of the night he says i answer other people but not him , here's proof that's not accurate: Link to topic:
Mio Posted July 25, 2019 Posted July 25, 2019 I went ahead and removed the feedback since there was clear communication and no scam occurred (negatives are mostly reserved and scams and the like. @aliraj, @D Bolter was very clear with you about the ups and definitely didn't ignore you and compensated with a proxy. The most this would warrant is a neutral if there was a promised time period and it wasn't delivered in time. There was a refund offered for the delay but you wanted to wait so I don't even think a neutral would exactly be necessary. But @aliraj or @D Bolter can you show me where it was promised within 48 hours? I can't seem to find anything concrete saying that.
D Bolter Posted July 25, 2019 Author Posted July 25, 2019 3 hours ago, Mio said: I went ahead and removed the feedback since there was clear communication and no scam occurred (negatives are mostly reserved and scams and the like. @aliraj, @D Bolter was very clear with you about the ups and definitely didn't ignore you and compensated with a proxy. The most this would warrant is a neutral if there was a promised time period and it wasn't delivered in time. There was a refund offered for the delay but you wanted to wait so I don't even think a neutral would exactly be necessary. But @aliraj or @D Bolter can you show me where it was promised within 48 hours? I can't seem to find anything concrete saying that. I think he's more upset that the VPS was down. But it's back up now. [hidden]
Mio Posted July 26, 2019 Posted July 26, 2019 Closing this due to user reading thread and not providing information requested.