OP is harsh.. but true. Some minor things like this need to be revised.

He tried to go around a rule when he said "__bot". He obviously meant the competitor, which, for obvious reasons, shouldn't be mentioned at all around here. He rightfully received a warning.

As for your second point a MM should not be allowed to give feedback as they assume no risk in the trade. You'd essentially be receiving two vouches for one trade which gives a false impression regarding your trustworthiness as each feedback would not really be representative of a unique trade.

He deserves a warning for saying aribot? U sir are fucked up in the head

He tried to go around a rule when he said "__bot". He obviously meant the competitor, which, for obvious reasons, shouldn't be mentioned at all around here. He rightfully received a warning.

As for your second point a MM should not be allowed to give feedback as they assume no risk in the trade. You'd essentially be receiving two vouches for one trade which gives a false impression regarding your trustworthiness as each feedback would not really be representative of a unique trade.

He deserves a warning for saying aribot? U sir are fucked up in the head

You, sir, lack the ability to think logically if you fail to understand the reasoning behind the warning and thus shouldn't be commenting on this thread. This is clearly the "intellectual" section of the forum.

The newly added MM rule has no affect to the market whatsoever. It only changes the vision of people.

 

Trust is based on the amount of feedbacks someone has. Allowing MM's to give feedback to buyer and seller, will cause them to receive two feedbacks for the same trade, meaning that these persons will be marked as trusted faster then they should be.

 

See it this way, person A has 100 positive feedback and person B as well. The only difference is that person B received double feedback for every trade he did.

Seeing the 100 positive feedback gives you an idea of how trusted that person is, so you'll see them both as equal, but person B is actually much less trusted.

 

Person A has done 100 trades that went positive, while person B actually only did 50 positive trades, but received double feedback.

We try to avoid this kind of issues, so that it isn't that easy to become trusted. Person B should stand under person A, and not near.

 

We hope that we will stimulate the market some more with this rule, giving feedbacks more value, and to be sure that trusted members have really earned their title.

 

 

And why can a middleman receive two feedbacks? Simply because they hold the money of two members, not one.

There is more risk involved, so more trust should be gained if the trade goes succesfull.

The newly added MM rule has no affect to the market whatsoever. It only changes the vision of people.

 

Trust is based on the amount of feedbacks someone has. Allowing MM's to give feedback to buyer and seller, will cause them to receive two feedbacks for the same trade, meaning that these persons will be marked as trusted faster then they should be.

 

See it this way, person A has 100 positive feedback and person B as well. The only difference is that person B received double feedback for every trade he did.

Seeing the 100 positive feedback gives you an idea of how trusted that person is, so you'll see them both as equall, but person B is actually much less trusted.

 

Person A has done 100 trades that went positive, while person B actually only did 50 positive trades, but received double feedback.

We try to avoid this kind of issues, so that it isn't that easy to become trusted.

 

We hope that we will stimulate the market some more with this rule, giving feedbacks more value, and to be sure that trusted members have really earned their title.

 

 

And why can a middleman receive two feedbacks? Simply because they hold the money of two members, not one.

There is more risk involved, so more trust should be gained if the trade goes succesfull.

Can't like your post but i would i recieved the positive quatives for the day or something