dirtydartt Posted April 10, 2017 Posted April 10, 2017 Came home from school after leaving my account alching all night, almost shit myself when I saw chat
Essaint Posted April 10, 2017 Posted April 10, 2017 If you're gonna be alching, just use a auto clicker. don't bot to alch. It's stupid and auto clicking has 1 % ban rate, and botting has like 90% 1
Final Posted April 10, 2017 Posted April 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Essaint said: If you're gonna be alching, just use a auto clicker. don't bot to alch. It's stupid and auto clicking has 1 % ban rate, and botting has like 90% 99% of people make up statistics too. 6
Essaint Posted April 10, 2017 Posted April 10, 2017 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Final said: 99% of people make up statistics too. I've auto clicked on 9 of my accs, none got banned. Edited April 10, 2017 by Essaint
IHB Posted April 10, 2017 Posted April 10, 2017 13 minutes ago, Essaint said: If you're gonna be alching, just use a auto clicker. don't bot to alch. It's stupid and auto clicking has 1 % ban rate, and botting has like 90% Ive botted on 76% of my accounts with a 49% rate of ban with a 93% chance of no ban by the end of 44% of weekdays brah high 5% 3
dirtydartt Posted April 10, 2017 Author Posted April 10, 2017 58 minutes ago, Essaint said: I've auto clicked on 9 of my accs, none got banned. have you botted alch on any? 1 hour ago, Final said: 99% of people make up statistics too. lol everyone tells me to autoclick, although ive been alching 10+ hours a day. not sure how a static timed autoclicker is better than a randomized alcher that takes breaks?
DevilApes Posted April 12, 2017 Posted April 12, 2017 ehhh maybe auto clicking was great back in the day
LimitedTime66 Posted April 13, 2017 Posted April 13, 2017 he's right, auto clicking even w/o randomization is very low ban rate. I could run an auto clicker for 10 hrs and not get banned or a d-hide tanner for 1hr and get banned the next day
Yarran1017 Posted April 18, 2017 Posted April 18, 2017 On 4/13/2017 at 0:14 PM, LimitedTime66 said: he's right, auto clicking even w/o randomization is very low ban rate. I could run an auto clicker for 10 hrs and not get banned or a d-hide tanner for 1hr and get banned the next day bahahah you can't compare the 2, they're completely different and the bans are heavily dependent on the script/anti-ban i understand autoclicking may be low banrate, but im with op, i dont see how autoclicking would be safer than a bot that has an anti-ban and takes breaks, it's literally just a more human-like version of an autoclicker 1
roklobster315 Posted April 19, 2017 Posted April 19, 2017 check reddit, your probly delayed banned, stone is going to do a bot busting stream soon and he is flagging accounts.
deadfish Posted April 20, 2017 Posted April 20, 2017 13 hours ago, roklobster315 said: check reddit, your probly delayed banned, stone is going to do a bot busting stream soon and he is flagging accounts. @dirtydartt keep us posted if you get any kind of ban in the next few weeks