cureently 60atk 92str should i just pk at 60atk 99str or get 75atk cons will be high cb pros will actually hit w ags dds rarely hits

Mine's 99/99/45, but i just wanted the cape.

Mine's 99/99/45, but i just wanted the cape.

not too economical for pking

was talking about this with logic I believe a while back, best to get 99 strength first. Pk with 99 strength and see how it fits you.

 

I see 75 attack pointless for a zerker, that is why I keep all my zerkers 60 attack.

Why fight higher defence players when you have easier targets at a lower combat.

75 if you can afford ags

was talking about this with logic I believe a while back, best to get 99 strength first. Pk with 99 strength and see how it fits you.

 

I see 75 attack pointless for a zerker, that is why I keep all my zerkers 60 attack.

Why fight higher defence players when you have easier targets at a lower combat.

because dds rarely hits even on 45def and ags spec hits fairly accurate on all defence levels

stay 60 attack. i did regret my decision to go 70 and then 75 ALOT.

Get 75 if you brid deep wild with sotd / ags if you only edge pk stay 60 because when you get 70 / 75 att you face more range tanks / dh prods

because dds rarely hits even on 45def and ags spec hits fairly accurate on all defence levels

dragon warhammer to gmaul?

not too economical for pking

 

i dont pk :P I just like to make PvM more challenging.

Edited August 9, 20169 yr by RDM

i dont pk :P I just like to make PvM more challenging.

 

Sounds boring.

I say keep 60 atk, cheaper pking and it's always funny when you rambo a dds spec. Not to mention, you will gain quite a bit of combat levels, and I don't think the ags alone is worth it. I will say though, if you are good with msb to ags and can 1 tick, it's surprisingly good and fun.

Edited August 12, 20169 yr by Grizzmudo

i feel ike the only perk is a better spec wep, u cant really use whip unless youre happy to continue above 75 attack...