Adept

EDIT: sold.

Post your prices below. Don't PM me.

except he resells private scripts srsly tho love this series

I've noticed that when using a WebWalking event, the bot clicks the next destination/position when it's around 4 tiles away from the current destination (marked by the red flag on the minimap). However, when I use a WalkingEvent and generate a path using Explv's OSBot Map, it clicks the next position when the bot is around 2 tiles away from the current destination. Is this simply due to the distance between the positions generated by the map and the distance between the positions generated by the WebWalker being different or is there another factor which is coming into play? ie. is the time when the next position is clicked solely dependent on the distance between positions?

Oh dang, check on this. I forgot to take the barriers into consideration. Thanks Apa.

If you spawn camp the implings, yes. You do not need snares.

Puro Puro is good money.

I posted a thread related to script optimizations to reduce lag a while back. Multiple users expressed a strong opinion against webWalking, stating it uses a lot of resources and pre-defined paths are the way to go. However I remember reading (I believe it was on a thread by @Abuse) that accounts can be banned for using the same static paths. He claims that webWalking fixed the issue.

context pls? diggin' the new sig

Oh, okay. Thanks for the clarification. What about HWID then?

Even though proxies can be used to "spoof" different IPs, doesn't the MAC address, which is common for all the bots running on the same computer (home pc or vps), reveal that they all are running on the same machine? Has it been confirmed if Jagex use it to chain-ban accounts?

What about the impact on resources? Will frequent use of gRandom instead of random lead to a drastic increase in CPU usage due to more computations?

Thank you so much for your help! Wishing you continued success with your gold farm!

How can I drink a potion while webWalking if run energy drops below a certain amount?

The constructor for BankSlotDestination requires a an integer named "widgetSlotId" as its second parameter. https://osbot.org/api/org/osbot/rs07/input/mouse/BankSlotDestination.html The documentation provides no definition for the value. What is it?

Being in the company of friends helps. When I'm alone I intentionally think of something that angers/enrages me and channel that anger into energy.

Both of the above can be used to manipulate the mouse. What are the advantages and disadvantages of each? I am attempting to click and move the mouse in quick succession (with the least possible delay). Which approach of the two is most suitable? Is there any way to combine multiple mouse events into one?

I'm afraid I can't share my source code since it's a private method. Thanks to all those who've shared some insight! I'll go through the code and amend according to your recommendations.

Interesting. Can you explain why not? Should I use WalkingEvents instead?

I've noticed that the client lags considerably when running my script. What measures can I take to ensure that my script consumes as little resources as possible? I've increased the onLoop counter to reduce loops per minute and am also using a series of "else if" conditional statements instead of a series of "if" statements to reduce the number of conditions checked. What else can I do?

Lose the animation or animate it differently. Edit: You changed it and I like it better now.

So that's like what? A total of circa 4b each month? Damn. Impressive, to say the least (if you manage to pull it off). Good luck.

You posted in your other thread that you were making almost $100 a day. That's way more than 1b/month. So your goals for this month are less than what you were making in previous months? No disrespect intended, simply confused.

Rest assured that I've done PLENTY of Googling but figured I'd ask the community for help while the bot is down and can't put the methods to the test. Thanks for your help. Very valid ideas, thank you

Mighty cool. I'll definitely look into the stuff you mentioned. Thank you so much for such a detailed answer.