Divvy

Why the fuck are you calling him and idiot? Let me just upload a pic of zezima's account and get him banned cause thats how it works. Idiot. So your telling me not to call him and you're calling me an idiot? Where's the logic son. What a horrible example you gave there Zezima is a Player Moderator he hardly plays RuneScape nor does he bot so it won't affect his account. Anyways @clickedspider most likely botted his account due to him being on a botting site so he does need to censor his name and not tell a botting community his RuneScape name. YES Jagex workers do come on botting sites. Well actually you dont know if jagex can ban someone for seeing their name on a botting forum or not, haven't heard of one case of it so i assume not. Hate when people assume shit and act like its fact Regardless, its good to get in the habit of not showing your username. If you accidentally post a picture of your account's username using a bot then there is still a chance you will get flagged or banned. Its just not a good idea, and seeing the username isn't necessary. Why light a fire next to dynamite? Don't take a chance.

Guys, guys...... This ^ This implies I'm an idiot. I obviously know about that function that is why I said in my original post "USER PICTURES", these images aren't just in signatures. And besides I shouldn't have to hide signatures; because some undergrown teenage boys feel it's 'cool' to put trash as their signature / icon. I'm not implying that you're an idiot. Its just a simple strait forward way of fixing your problem whilst giving everyone else their right to flashy signatures/avatars.

Wow this still works fine. Good job.

Guys, guys...... This ^

Just check the SDN

We’ve all heard it before. The classic argument from a theist’s perspective on why a god must have created our universe. I can’t tell you how many times religious people have said to me: “well, can you think of one example where something comes from nothing in the universe?” They are correct in noting that “something cannot be created from nothing” within our known universe, as far as we have been able to demonstrate through scientific inquiry. However, when considering the big bang and the origins of our known universe, we cannot apply the laws of physics WITHIN the known universe to that which act OUTSIDE the known universe. Before the start of our universe, it is plausible that other laws of “physics” governed and dictated how our universe singularity began and where the energy and material originated from. Additionally, when a theist states that “something cannot come from nothing” and then states that a god created the known universe, he still hasn’t solved his own question. Is god “something”? Why, yes, god is something. Then where did he come from? Theists usually state that god is eternal, and always existed and was never created. This statement violates the first assumption they make that “something cannot come from nothing”. God is a “something” and they are supposing he came from “nothing”. All this supposing gets us nowhere, which is why we turn to evidence and the scientific method of inquiry to find answers. When we do not know the answer, we continue searching, testing and finding evidence for what is actually real, while admitting that we do not know the answer until we have evidence. There is a notable phenomenon observed in quantum mechanics. Particles composed of quarks such as protons, neutrons, positrons, etc have been observed popping into existence from nowhere and leaving again just as fast. Such particles “appear” in a vacuum where no other matter or energy exists. At the quantum level, even empty space is not truly empty but is seething with activity; particles are constantly popping in and out of existence everywhere. In pair creation, a particle and its antimatter partner seem to “appear” (see Bosons). This is cutting edge quantum mechanics research. The Large Hadron Collider in Switzlerand was built and is just recently up and running in the search for the Higgs-Boson particle. We cannot apply the laws of this universe to that which acted outside of the universe. The laws that hold true within the bubble of our universe may not govern outside the bounds of this universe. It is plausible that there are endless numbers of other universes “floating” about and our universe is just one of them. Within each of these multi-verses different laws and properties may govern the interactions within. This “Multiverse theory” is the leading theory in the scientific cosmology community, though it remains untested and still a speculation. (Though this speculation is based on other observations and evidence of how our universe operates). It is probable that the “laws” that act outside our bubble universe commonly call into existence something from nothing. It is also possible that our universe is eternal, in the sense that it cycles through stages. We cannot say with certainty so it is irresponsible to jump to a conclusion without the ability to test or prove it to be false or true. This applies to the multi-verse theory and the theory of a god or gods. I dont thing you read what I said.

This is my point. Scientific belief completely relies on faith as well. That a "magic vacuum" a "foreign entity" exists even though we have never seen or have no proof of it. Which is why it is so hypocritical to say that "God does Not exist", as a statement, rather than saying "Well, even though we have hard evidence through science, it is still possible that there could be a creator out there somewhere." Science doesn't rely on faith but on theories, the difference between religion and science is that scientists try to prove their claims whereas religion doesn't (don't bring up Aquinas or any other church-related philosopher; their mind games don't count as scientific proof). "Magic vacuum" common really? No proof? It has actually been created by man and observed in space: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum And you can't see a vacuum considering it's lack of matter. Also.. I never excluded the possibility of divine existence: Read my shit before you call me a hypocrite thank you very much. I never called you a hypocrite. Simmer down.

This is my point. Scientific belief completely relies on faith as well. That a "magic vacuum" a "foreign entity" exists even though we have never seen or have no proof of it. Which is why it is so hypocritical to say that "God does Not exist", as a statement, rather than saying "Well, even though we have hard evidence through science, it is still possible that there could be a creator out there somewhere."

I use LogMeIn with my iPhone

Both matter and antimatter have been generated from vacuums by scientists. Your statements are false. A vacuum cannot be created from nothing. It needs a lack of something, which is matter, which according to science would have to be existing. The concept of a vacuum only exists because there is matter to take away. Therefor, my statement is true.

Orange County, California :0

18

Heres my two cents. I'll try to keep it simple. According to science, matter cannot be created nor can it be destroyed. If that's so, then where did this all come from? Many people would respond to this as such,"this couldn't have happened out of nothing ... but something far more powerful could have!"or the alternative"this can't have always existed ... but something far more powerful could have!" This is the problem i have with the "infinite causes theory" for lack of a better term. Yes, I agree that everything, in this universe, must have a cause. But, assuming that there was a creator that caused the universe into existence, the laws of the creation do not necessarily affect the actions of the creator. For the sake of argument i am going to assume that there is a creator of the universe. If he created everything around us, everything we see and do not see, and one of those foundational principles of the universe is that everything must have a cause, it still does not mean that the creator is affected by it. Creator > Creation. So therefore the creator does not necessarily need to have something that caused it to come into existence. He/She/It is not subject to the laws of his/her/its own creation Sorry if that was a little vague, im not exactly the most articulate person But I do know that something cannot be made out of nothing. It is impossible. I don't fully deny and reject the theory that the universe is possibly expanding from a single point. It could be true, it could not be true, but i have not seen enough evidence to justify that theory. I am not going to accept the notion that humans are just a sole little quirk, or stain upon the face of the earth that just happened to develop intelligence, and that there is nothing more out there that is more wise or capable than us. I think humans, so far, have proven that we can not possibly understand the mathematics and complexity that comprises even a single atom, much less of the entire known universe. I refuse to believe that we are a product of chance; here today, gone tomorrow, with no purpose.

The link is broken

lol. I love the comedy. Looks like a good script. Cant wait.

This seems really cool. Cant wait until the release.

Very good. Thank you.

Thank You.

Awesome! Thank you.

This looks promising. Just waiting for the new link to be posted.

Will definitely put this to good use. Thank you for this!