dmms659

Shittiest fucking premium script I ever used. Got my refund atleast. Tried it for a long time and would not recommend anyone to use this. No anti-ban features whatsoever. Fucking dumb coder aswell.

how can you admire people who leave their responsibilities lmao

do you guys know for sure that after the 2day ban you won't be permed on login?

ivew heared somewhere that 2day is just a time period where they review ur acc also what does bot busting moderate mean? automated bans or a manual?

Is 2 day = perm? In the sense that they review your account or something? Or is a lucky 2day instead of a perm?

@Czar easy fix for the bank opening and closing - make the bot press once on the bank instead of like 3 times

does this support rock caking instead of the pray?

@Czar listen this is kinda getting pathetic now, i keep suggesting you shit to add but you're ignoring it the string jewerlly portion of this script is heavily not-efficient, it has huge delays between finishing the batch of amulets and banking and thus wasting a ton of xp/hr on top of looking non human when the bot actually decides to bank it will open the bank, close it with ESC, open it, ESC, open it, ESC and then decide to bank. seriously it's like watching some shitty free bot what you can do to fix this - add a counter system to immediately bank when 27 amulets are stringed (28 minus the astral runes) not using this untill you fix because this shit will get me banned

@Czar Just watched the bot contiounsly try to re-open the bank 10 times. It will open the bank, ESC close it, open it, ESC close it, etc, for like 2-5 times once in a while. Not using it for the time being.... Can you please work out these bugs? I feel like im on the only one who runs this while babysitting and watch it fuck up all the time.

@Czar the script takes a good time to recognize when it's done stringing jewerlys. Can you please fix? You claimed with v100 this will be shortened, but it takes the script 5-10 seconds to recognize when the spell is done (maybe add a counter system instead of antimation detection? i.e once 27 ammies are done, bank) - because this easily takes away around 10k exp per hour. also, what changes did you do to the castle wars banking? now it seems like theres a new problem - the bot opens the bank, closes the bank really quickly, and opens it again. What to do to make this script perfect: 1.Add bank deposit 2.Add a counter system so the script isn't relying on animation - after 27 casts (full inv, minus the runes) of string jewellry, the script will click bank 3.Add random camera movements/actions once in a while. I ran this bot for hours and it remained the same, so I had to manually do it myself. What human doesn't move the camera for that amount of time?

@Czar banking seems to be buggy, it looks like it opens the bank then closes very quickly, which could lead to a ban. can you also add in the deposit-all bank? like in ur zmi script or whateveR?

same problem here about the bank also, what changed about banking @ cwars? it remained the same

PETITION TO PUSH v100 with bank depost option boys @Czar

@Czarseems like v100 isn't pushed yet. i'm still on 99. can you please, while you're at it, add the deposit all? you have no idea how much more human-like and faster it looks, and it also speeds up exp/hr by like 8k

yes. instead of depositing the items you make via magic with bank-all right click, you place bank placeholders and click deposit-all can you add it asap please? its both a good anti-ban and a good exp booster. @Czar

@Czar can you push the update for the deposit all bank button? It will provide a good exp boost overtime. And it's also more human-like.

Since when suggestions are a bad thing you retard? Im trying to better his script lmao. He already added some features that I suggested so there's nothing wrong with clarifying myself

Any chance for a small anti-ban during the afk phase of the string jewerly spell? Theres a solid 40-60 seconds of litteraly afking in the same mouse position and its very not human like... Also, any updates on the deposit all bank button banking? The script and even include an anti-ban or a pattern breaking by every once in a while that will bank by right clicking the item and selecting bank-all, etc.

@Czar Can you push the update with the bank button to deposit all? Also please speed up the time it takes to detect that it's been done with an inventory of amulets for the string ammy spell current procedure goes like script withdraws amulets > small delay to close bank (that adds up and is not human-like) > magic book and clicks on string jewerlly > clicks on inv > afk till its done > done (delay of few secs that add up!!) > deposits amulets > repeat what an efficnet, human-like behavior is script withdraws amulets > esc to close bank with no delays > script can alternate between f clicking magic book and manual clicking > afk for a random time > then click inventory > amulets finished > depost all via button

@Czar can you randomize the time it takes from clicking the string jewerlly spell to the inventory? a inv takes about a minute so clicking the inventory right away isnt very human like, most ppl just click the spell and afk for a few seconds before clicking the inv

o.o how long did u bot @ sandcrabs lol

how

You seemed to have misread my post, retard. I said this doesn't deserve premium for the STRING JEWELRY SPELL. It has delays, is bot-like, and has an easy recognizable pattern to it. The script waits 2-5 (and somtimes more) between finishing an inv of amulets and bank, and vice-versa (withdrawing, etc)

@Czar The script has tremendous delays after finishing an inventory of the spell "string jewerlly" and has delays while banking and withdrawing can you tidy it up a bit? I feel like it doesnt deserve a premium status with how it handles this specific spell.

@Czar Also while it is not noticeable to the human eye, the differences are so small that it's impossible for a human to click within the same ballpark the script clicks. If a human clicks within ~20 random pixels, this script clicks within 3-9 pixels, which is not human-like. While its true that its not the exact spot, it is not human-like to click within 3-9 pixels everytime. randomizing the spell clicking area will be a good anti-ban aswell i know im going overboard - but id rather be safe than sorry.