Token

The fact that everyone will report you there. It's full of nolifer fucks trying to get max hp/hr and will report you just if your bot mines the same rock as them or if your character is dressed odd/has botlike stats/is not responding properly to all their dumb questions.

Get the npc and check every loop whether it is interacting or not, if it has to be interacting with other players then also check that you are not interacting with this npc. If it was interacting in a previous loop iteration and now it is no longer interacting, you start timing 10 seconds (just save the time and check if 10 seconds have passed in further loop iterations) and then you got what you wanted.

What do you mean by MouseDestination of a widget? Widgets don't have a mouse themselves so their mouse can't have a destination.

I personally use Khal's MLM

Motherlode mine is definately lower ban rate than the traditional iron/granite mining. Don't go to the upper floor though unless you really insist to get banned.

You definately forgot to mention it would also have to be a woman. There aren't many women playing runescape so banning the very few women out there wouldn't be constructive. I believe black women are the ones enjoying this game the most as they avoid all bans.

As soon as I read the first line, I understood the sarcasm in "perfect" it's not only Czar tho. I support this

Dark Magician announced a zulrah script, you should expect it by 2018.

People are only middlemanning for feedback, not for money. How is that even relevant to the market? The thing about service owners not being allowed to receive feedback for their workers' jobs is pretty much the same. They only act as middlemen in that case. I'm trying to say middlemanning should be a REAL SERVICE and thus a paid one, not something you do for free to farm false feedback. If people have issues trusting others with 10m they can still pay a 1% fee which is like 100k to a middleman. I'm quite sure that won't make them stop using middlemen.

1. A description of the suggestion Everyone wants to get rid of "feedback farming", that's why we recently got a new rule about service owners not being allowed to receive feedback for their workers' completed assignents even though they act as middlemen. Still everyone gets a lot of feedback by offering free middleman services which is quite the same case as the one mentioned above. Middlemanning 100 x 10m transactions in 1 month to get quick 100 feedback is definately not going to show any kind of trust when most of these users scam quit after 1 month by selling accounts/chargebacking and abusing that false feedback which is not relevant at all. So we should not allow middlemen to receive feedback for transactions under a certain amount (maybe 500m or so) unless they are paid for this service (so we get rid of all the free middlemen scam quits). 2. How will this suggestion impact scripters and/or botters? It will prevent users from farming false feedback. 3. Post any examples such as code or pictures to supplement your description (optional) Look through all the banned users list, there are quite enough with a lot of feedback from free middlemanning who scam quit after a real trade.

You can simply use inventory.getItem("Knife").interact(); inventory.getItem("Logs").interact(); But the way you wrote it may also work. Don't forget to delay the 2nd interaction until the first one is completed otherwise your script will mess up. Also it's not on the topic but just so you know, myPlayer().isAnimating() is not what you want to use in any of your scripts. Fletching animation takes 3 or 4 ticks then 1 tick THE PLAYER WILL NOT BE ANIMATING and then start again, so your code will have bugs there. Also null checking the widget before checking its visibility might help.

~14 hours botted

It will burn calories but won't make your muscles grow much (if they will grow at all).

My Skype: tokenscape What service are you ordering: 20 accounts Payment method: OSRS gp Do you agree to TOS: yes

I wish I could select all your clothes and press delete.

Disputed member: Vag Thread Link: http://osbot.org/forum/topic/82466-selling-106cb-barrows-pure-1200-total-dt-done-99-str/ Explanation: Bought an account off him last month, the account has been recovered today. *removed by staff* that email is definately not mine - http://puu.sh/kUZQx/e5e96106d3.jpg

You shouldn't be that concerned about hidden numbers... people use them all the time when they call me, i simply don't answer. Then one day my mom complained about not answering her phone calls and I realised it was her calling me with a hidden number.

Well then provided that it has no bans and you got some patience you might get 200m for it since it has quite good stats overall

I'd say it's 150-200m, depends on how many quests you have done

whats your max hp on the acc you are testing it?

Could you add a check for ground items (clay) before it logs out if it has no clay in inventory on rimmington unnote mode? That might stop it from losing clay... just happened 3rd time.

The cash pile would be about $200 but the account itself wouldn't sell for more than $150 because of that botting ban.

I tried the rimmington unnote clay method because it keeps getting stuck when trying to bank and missclicks on collect (happens to almost every script nowadays, I guess it's the client) and it works almost flawlessly, ran the unnote method on 8 accounts at once for about 10 hours and it worked flawlessly with the exception of 2 major incidents: it put my noted clay on the table inside that general store and logged out. (lost 5k clay once, managed to recover 2nd time tho)

It's a really great script but are breaks not supported when using demon butler? Whenever it takes a break and logs back in, it just sits at the portal and doesn't enter the house.

Thanks