StolenLogic

how much 07 do you want? God I just want to beat the shit out of that retard in that Gif you have below your name.

85 wc NO BLACKMARKS TY IF INTERESTED IN BUY CONTACT SKYPE: Stolenlogic TY

Bad Example.... CEO (Chief executive Officer) is the highest rank you can become in a organization.... Your example suggests the person who got demoted, was the highest rank on OSBOT and got demoted after becoming the highest rank elsewhere. You should have used CHRO (Chief Human Resources Officer) in the example not CEO.... I don't really care... The point still stands.

How could you expect Maxi not to demote him, when he is one of the lead admins on a competitors site...? That's like if the CEO for McDonalds got hired as the CEO of Burger King, and then was surprised when he got fired...

I agree. This should be fixed!

Haha, very funny.

Hi, Need help choosing a botting computer, if anyone is willing to help me, please add my Skype: Stolenlogic I would be willing to pay for compensation.

I'm sorry but if you think you can manage to do 30 pull-ups with strict form within 7 months drug-free then you're delusional, even with twig legs it's impossible. First off you can do anything as long ass you are constant with the training and as long as you believe you can. Secondly what the hell does twig legs have to do with a pull up your using your upper body not your lower body. I love when people post this stuff though it give me more motivation to get it done and prove them wrong. check back in 7 months you will see me doing 30 pullups. If you have small legs it will be easier to do bodyweight exercises like pull-ups since you have less mass. And no, you won't be doing 30 pull-ups within 7 months of training drug-free. Bye. bye your negativity is not needed anyway. You mean his rationality? You are deluded if you think "First off you can do anything as long ass you are constant with the training and as long as you believe you can." Is that why all of the top Bodybuilders/Powerlifters of the last 10 years, who have been consistently training, and have been believing in their selves to a degree you havn't come close to experiencing(Ronnie Coleman, Jay Cutler, Scot Mendelson, Ryan Kennelly) havn't changed their physiques/strength AT ALL? Clearly, you don't know shit about muscle-building- Perhaps you should start listening to those who do.

Can anyone confirm what this script's actual Gp/Hr is? Thanks

Some kind of response would be nice hmmm, may or may not add this in. Overall im not sure if it will be worth it or not though. The time wasted upon failing the obstical make the trip actually longer then running the current route I think. While successfully doing it only speeds it up by ~ 2-3 seconds (maybe ~5-7%). I do not think you can fail that jump yeah you can :\ you fall in the water and take like 4 damage or something You're thinking of ardougne. The obstacle LifeRuiner is referring to is about 10-20 tiles south-west of fally west. It's a wall you climb-over, it's impossible to fail, and speeds up time taken to arrive at talvery dungeon by probably 30 secs- 1min.

"Why i cant on osbot" Lol R.I.P. English language

I dont see why bans matter, as jagex now perm bans for macroing regardless of whether or not you have previous offences. But seeing as you're qqing and didn't answer the man, I'll assume you have a ban. "a ban" I have multiple accounts, some with bans, some without- mostly accounts without. I used to get "botbusting moderate", but since like a month ago every ban I've recieved was "goldfarming". The botbusting's take 2 for a perm ban, the goldfarming ones are insta-perm ban. I believe Jagex hands them out near-exclusively now.

I dont see why bans matter, as jagex now perm bans for macroing regardless of whether or not you have previous offences.

Title says it all. Thank you!

Wrong sir. people reported that they were not botting high bannable spots and still get banned. There is millions of threads saying "i was not even botting a high saturated place blah blah blah". I do have a dynamic home ip and been banned with low saturated spots and so has alot of other people. They could have been banned for failing a random.

I am sorry, but you cannot divide by infinity, because infinity is not a number, it is a concept. I just proved it's impossible! 0% chance, as in it cannot happen Your whole case seems to rest on your belief which you've "simplified" as "any number divided by infinity = 0. " Which, you pulled out of your ass- It is not factually based, at all. I don't know where you got that from. You're going to have to provide actual evidence that it is a 0% chance. Provide, for example, the number of times in which the coin is flipped where, from there on out it can reach heads no longer. I would be very interested, as that makes no sense at all. Read Zappa's post. I'm just going to assume you both missed that part of the post...I did indeed prove that if you flipped a coin an infinite amount of times, there is a 0% chance that you would get heads every time. I'll try to explain again, but first, you have to understand what flipping a coin an infinite amount of times means. Infinity is not a number, so when you do something an "infinite amount of times", it means you cannot put a number on the amount of times you flipped that coin, the amount of times it is flipped is never ending. Obviously your idea of "at some point in time it will have to be tails" is ridiculous if you are trying to come up with some type of actual proof. But once again, I will state the logical outcome of flipping a coin an infinite amount of times, and try to explain it better. If you flip a coin, the chances of it landing on heads x times in a row is 1/2^x for x greater than 0. If we are going to perform this task an infinite amount of times, this means we have to take the limit as x approaches infinity of 1/2^x. The limit of this is 0, if you need a proof on limits, go google it. Now you might be saying, "but wait!!, just because the limit is zero doesn't mean it actually reaches 0!!", yes, that is true, but in reality you also never reach infinity, because there is always a number which is bigger than whatever one you are on. The point is, if you COULD flip a coin for an infinite amount of trials, the probability of having heads for every one of that infinite set of trials would be exactly zero. What you seem to be wanting to know is if there is some specific point where the probability becomes zero, and that point is one infinitely far away, a point which we can never reach in reality. So to clarify things further, doing an infinite amount of trials is just taking a limit, because you can't actually do an infinite amount of trials. The only way to deal with infinities is to use limits, to see what number the function approaches as you approach infinity. And to make things more interesting for you, for x E N ( x is an element of the Natural set of Numbers), for every x, there is a non-zero probability that you will flip heads every time, where x is the number of times you flip the coin. BUT, IF YOU FLIP A COIN AN INFINITE AMOUNT OF TIMES, THE PROBABILITY BECOMES ZERO I hope that will convince you that there is indeed a 0 probability, but then again, I don't think you understand your question yet. "The limit of this is 0, if you need a proof on limits, go google it." I did, first two sources say you're wrong. http://www.mathsisfun.com/calculus/limits-infinity.html https://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~kouba/CalcOneDIRECTORY/liminfdirectory/LimitInfinity.html You are trying to say the limit to infinity is 0, it is not, and CANNOT be calculated because infinity is not a number. To bad you didn't actually read the links you posted, or you might have learned something...Once you finish highschool math, you will learn that you can in fact take limits to infinity. All of calculus is based around this concept. And in case you still have doubts, you can just use a calculator http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=lim+x-%3Einfinity+1%2Fx. The only real issue you could have with this is that a limit is the number you are approaching, not one you actually ever reach. But it is the same concept as you never actually reaching infinity, because there is no sign that says "Here, this is infinity, you've gone far enough". But when you say you flip a coin an infinite amount of times, then you are just hypothetically saying "what if we could reach infinity", well then, we would also reach 0 probability. 1st link http://www.mathsisfun.com/calculus/limits-infinity.html Question: What is the value of 1/∞ ? Answer: We don't know! 2nd link https://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~kouba/CalcOneDIRECTORY/liminfdirectory/LimitInfinity.html In fact, the forms and are examples of indeterminate forms. Please show me where both of those articles later contradict themselves.

I am sorry, but you cannot divide by infinity, because infinity is not a number, it is a concept. I just proved it's impossible! 0% chance, as in it cannot happen Your whole case seems to rest on your belief which you've "simplified" as "any number divided by infinity = 0. " Which, you pulled out of your ass- It is not factually based, at all. I don't know where you got that from. You're going to have to provide actual evidence that it is a 0% chance. Provide, for example, the number of times in which the coin is flipped where, from there on out it can reach heads no longer. I would be very interested, as that makes no sense at all. Read Zappa's post. I'm just going to assume you both missed that part of the post...I did indeed prove that if you flipped a coin an infinite amount of times, there is a 0% chance that you would get heads every time. I'll try to explain again, but first, you have to understand what flipping a coin an infinite amount of times means. Infinity is not a number, so when you do something an "infinite amount of times", it means you cannot put a number on the amount of times you flipped that coin, the amount of times it is flipped is never ending. Obviously your idea of "at some point in time it will have to be tails" is ridiculous if you are trying to come up with some type of actual proof. But once again, I will state the logical outcome of flipping a coin an infinite amount of times, and try to explain it better. If you flip a coin, the chances of it landing on heads x times in a row is 1/2^x for x greater than 0. If we are going to perform this task an infinite amount of times, this means we have to take the limit as x approaches infinity of 1/2^x. The limit of this is 0, if you need a proof on limits, go google it. Now you might be saying, "but wait!!, just because the limit is zero doesn't mean it actually reaches 0!!", yes, that is true, but in reality you also never reach infinity, because there is always a number which is bigger than whatever one you are on. The point is, if you COULD flip a coin for an infinite amount of trials, the probability of having heads for every one of that infinite set of trials would be exactly zero. What you seem to be wanting to know is if there is some specific point where the probability becomes zero, and that point is one infinitely far away, a point which we can never reach in reality. So to clarify things further, doing an infinite amount of trials is just taking a limit, because you can't actually do an infinite amount of trials. The only way to deal with infinities is to use limits, to see what number the function approaches as you approach infinity. And to make things more interesting for you, for x E N ( x is an element of the Natural set of Numbers), for every x, there is a non-zero probability that you will flip heads every time, where x is the number of times you flip the coin. BUT, IF YOU FLIP A COIN AN INFINITE AMOUNT OF TIMES, THE PROBABILITY BECOMES ZERO I hope that will convince you that there is indeed a 0 probability, but then again, I don't think you understand your question yet. "The limit of this is 0, if you need a proof on limits, go google it." I did, first two sources say you're wrong. http://www.mathsisfun.com/calculus/limits-infinity.html https://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~kouba/CalcOneDIRECTORY/liminfdirectory/LimitInfinity.html You are trying to say the limit to infinity is 0, it is not, and CANNOT be calculated because infinity is not a number. But We Can Approach It!So instead of trying to work it out for infinity (because we can't get a sensible answer), let's try larger and larger values of x: x 1/x 1 1.00000 2 0.50000 4 0.25000 10 0.10000 100 0.01000 1,000 0.00100 10,000 0.00010 Now we can see that as x gets larger, 1/x tends towards 0 Literally first link, first page. yes... I agree with that? are you on my side or against me? That is my stance... that it gets incredibly small, but never actually reaches zero.

I am sorry, but you cannot divide by infinity, because infinity is not a number, it is a concept. I just proved it's impossible! 0% chance, as in it cannot happen Your whole case seems to rest on your belief which you've "simplified" as "any number divided by infinity = 0. " Which, you pulled out of your ass- It is not factually based, at all. I don't know where you got that from. You're going to have to provide actual evidence that it is a 0% chance. Provide, for example, the number of times in which the coin is flipped where, from there on out it can reach heads no longer. I would be very interested, as that makes no sense at all. Read Zappa's post. I'm just going to assume you both missed that part of the post...I did indeed prove that if you flipped a coin an infinite amount of times, there is a 0% chance that you would get heads every time. I'll try to explain again, but first, you have to understand what flipping a coin an infinite amount of times means. Infinity is not a number, so when you do something an "infinite amount of times", it means you cannot put a number on the amount of times you flipped that coin, the amount of times it is flipped is never ending. Obviously your idea of "at some point in time it will have to be tails" is ridiculous if you are trying to come up with some type of actual proof. But once again, I will state the logical outcome of flipping a coin an infinite amount of times, and try to explain it better. If you flip a coin, the chances of it landing on heads x times in a row is 1/2^x for x greater than 0. If we are going to perform this task an infinite amount of times, this means we have to take the limit as x approaches infinity of 1/2^x. The limit of this is 0, if you need a proof on limits, go google it. Now you might be saying, "but wait!!, just because the limit is zero doesn't mean it actually reaches 0!!", yes, that is true, but in reality you also never reach infinity, because there is always a number which is bigger than whatever one you are on. The point is, if you COULD flip a coin for an infinite amount of trials, the probability of having heads for every one of that infinite set of trials would be exactly zero. What you seem to be wanting to know is if there is some specific point where the probability becomes zero, and that point is one infinitely far away, a point which we can never reach in reality. So to clarify things further, doing an infinite amount of trials is just taking a limit, because you can't actually do an infinite amount of trials. The only way to deal with infinities is to use limits, to see what number the function approaches as you approach infinity. And to make things more interesting for you, for x E N ( x is an element of the Natural set of Numbers), for every x, there is a non-zero probability that you will flip heads every time, where x is the number of times you flip the coin. BUT, IF YOU FLIP A COIN AN INFINITE AMOUNT OF TIMES, THE PROBABILITY BECOMES ZERO I hope that will convince you that there is indeed a 0 probability, but then again, I don't think you understand your question yet. "The limit of this is 0, if you need a proof on limits, go google it." I did, first two sources say you're wrong. http://www.mathsisfun.com/calculus/limits-infinity.html https://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~kouba/CalcOneDIRECTORY/liminfdirectory/LimitInfinity.html You are trying to say the limit to infinity is 0, it is not, and CANNOT be calculated because infinity is not a number.

I just proved it's impossible! 0% chance, as in it cannot happen Your whole case seems to rest on your belief which you've "simplified" as "any number divided by infinity = 0. " Which, you pulled out of your ass- It is not factually based, at all. I don't know where you got that from. You're going to have to provide actual evidence that it is a 0% chance. Provide, for example, the number of times in which the coin is flipped where, from there on out it can reach heads no longer. I would be very interested, as that makes no sense at all. Read Zappa's post.

lol. I wasn't asking how "lucky" you would have to be for it to happen, I was asking strictly if it was possible. It dosen't matter that the chance of it happening is less than .00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001. As long as the chance is there, it is possible. On the other hand, in my view, it seems equally rational to assume that since it is infinity, there also is the inevitability of it landing on tails, since there are unlimited chances. So idk.

If a coin is tossed an infinite amount of times, is it possible for it to land on heads every flip for infinity? Or must it eventually succumb to infinity, and land on tails?

Yes it does. I'm running 18 bots right now and using around 6gb of ram on a linux machine. 32 gb is a crap tonne of ram though That's amazing dude. I can't run more than 8 bots on my 8 GB RAM labtop until it starts lagging like crazy. Do you run them all on one client?

What? Don't listen to that guy. Okay for CPU I would recommend the i7 4770k. PSU, go with a 700W 80+ Gold or Bronze standard PSU like the Corsair GS700. Thanks! Ok, isn't there other stuff I need for a computer too though? I accepted your Skype request, it says your offline?

Hi, All I know is that I want my computer to have 32 GB of RAM. As for CPU, power supply ect, I have no clue what to get! If anyone could help me that would be very much apreciated! My skype is "Stolenlogic" if you would prefer to talk on there. Thanks! Matt

Don't wanna be banned