Flamezzz

The chatbox has a private chat option

Hey I can help you out, not on skype but you can find me in the chatbox

Yes it's vip only. For public scripts it looks like it reduces ban rates.

Well... for me it seems to work just fine lol As for the interaction. This widget doesn't seem to support that. So you could just use widget.hover(), mouse.click(true) and check if the menu (there's a menu api) is open, if it's open use menu.selectAction("action").

if(widgets.get(162,32) != null && widgets.get(162,32).isVisible()) { keyboard.typeString("something", true); }

Nope

SOLD

implement MessageListener and define the listener method class ... extends Script implements Painter, MessageListener public void onMessage(Message m) { if(m.getType().equals(Message.MessageType.GAME)) { // game message } if(m.getType().equals(Message.MessageType.PLAYER)) { // player message } }

Alright so once you interact with the guy, a widget pops up, you can use the widgets api to interact with that thing. In the bot client, check settings->debug->widgetdebugger to find the widget ids hint: use widgets.get, widgets.isVisible and widgets.interact to program the interaction Good luck, if you can't find the ids or smth feel free to post here or pm me and I'll visit the saw-mill guy to help you out

Yes keep in mind that auto checking scripts for malicious code is impossible, since it's difficult to define malicious in this context. As for global 'walking', probably 5-10 people have this at least partially implemented atm for the osbot api. Would be nice if we could merge those systems into a decent api, but it's not a priority. Global 'walking' is only needed for complex scripts, and the scripters who are able to write such complex scripts should have no difficulty implementing global 'walking'. It would take a lot of time to fully implement global navigation and maintain it...

Looks like another widget bug introduced in the resizable update. Notify the script developer, the script dev should post a bug report or fix it if it's not an api issue.

"Focus can play a very important factor in your script; it could be the difference between a ban or not." Is this an assumption or have you actually put this to the test?

Hmm... I think you could do this mouse.move(inventory.getMouseDestination(SLOT_ID)); mouse.click(false);

As in, I'd rather allocate the resources for my bot farm. Resizable seems to use 1.5-2x cpu power for me.

No, waste of cpu. When I play legit I play on multiple accounts at the same time anyway so its not really useful for me.

But not a check for e.exists(), which might be an issue in the first while loop :p

I love the missclicks You know your script is well written once it can handle missclicks. imo it doesn't missclick that often. Just look up the current implementation and try to 'improve' it, no need to do fancy stuff with fonts you got all the widget sizes.

So while this happens, is onLoop still being called? If this is the case, it's your script. If not, and you have no while loops, some API method is most likely blocking. The only method im aware of which may do that is localwalker#walk. It shouldn't be difficult to check where it goes wrong if you just add a shitload of log messages.

Nice snippet For moving the mouse inside the rect you might wanna use MouseEvent me = new MoveMouseEvent(new RectangleDestination(bot, menu.getOptionRectangle(idx))); that's what Menu#selectAction does (EDIT: might be better considering the upcoming resizable stuff )

you could use position.interact(bot, "Walk here")

http://osbot.org/forum/topic/70076-mousekeys-like-mouse-movement/

GraphicsUtilities#drawModel?

in isMultiCombatArea() it returns health of npc > 0 else it returns not(npc is under attack) or npc interacts with myplayer and health of npc > 0

Highly doubt it, what's wrong with storing dropped items in a list?

Is selecting an item at position 2 an issue? RS2Widget geSearchItemsMain = widgets.get(548, 125); for(RS2Widget item : geSearchItemsMain.getChildWidgets()) { if(!item.getMessage().equals("")) { log(item.getMessage() + " - " + item.getRootId() + ":" + item.getSecondLevelId() + ":" + item.getThirdLevelId()); } } -> [iNFO][bot #1][05/26 01:43:29 PM]: 3rd age amulet - 548:125:1 [iNFO][bot #1][05/26 01:43:29 PM]: 3rd age bow - 548:125:4 [iNFO][bot #1][05/26 01:43:29 PM]: 3rd age cloak - 548:125:7 [iNFO][bot #1][05/26 01:43:29 PM]: 3rd age full helmet - 548:125:10 [iNFO][bot #1][05/26 01:43:29 PM]: 3rd age kiteshield - 548:125:13 [iNFO][bot #1][05/26 01:43:29 PM]: 3rd age longsword - 548:125:16 [iNFO][bot #1][05/26 01:43:29 PM]: 3rd age mage hat - 548:125:19 [iNFO][bot #1][05/26 01:43:29 PM]: 3rd age platebody - 548:125:22 [iNFO][bot #1][05/26 01:43:29 PM]: 3rd age platelegs - 548:125:25 [iNFO][bot #1][05/26 01:43:29 PM]: 3rd age range coif - 548:125:28 [iNFO][bot #1][05/26 01:43:29 PM]: 3rd age range legs - 548:125:31 [iNFO][bot #1][05/26 01:43:29 PM]: 3rd age range top - 548:125:34 [iNFO][bot #1][05/26 01:43:29 PM]: 3rd age robe - 548:125:37 [iNFO][bot #1][05/26 01:43:29 PM]: 3rd age robe top - 548:125:40 [iNFO][bot #1][05/26 01:43:29 PM]: 3rd age vambraces - 548:125:43 [iNFO][bot #1][05/26 01:43:29 PM]: 3rd age wand - 548:125:46 items are at interface 548:125:(1+3p)