Pseudo

Started the rewrite yesterday, due to how busy I am it'll probs take a few days.

Contemplating a total rewrite of this if I get enough free time from school/studying. It would be far superior to this/@GoldenGates' script.

If the script is written to a high enough standard where it's written from a players perspective, antiban should not be necessary.

70 range isn't needed, it makes things faster is all. I've done it at 56 range (starting) on a pure in the past.

2/10. Jew.

@@GoldenGates, you're just lucky I don't spend the 30 minutes or so to write my own and take away any possible purchases you'd be getting in the near future.

Ty.

I will not be updating this. Do not contact me about this, I couldn't give two shits. Does it still work? I've no idea, but I told Golden Gates that if his piece of crap script got premium I'd release mine. The code is ugly as hell, most of it is not mine (I wasn't wasting the time to write my own). It used to work, whether it still does or not I've no idea. If you read the above and still want to try it (and save yourself some money), you can download it HERE. @@GoldenGates this is for you babe.

3 weapons, wat. Beast calculation though. Because obviously specPercent / percentNeeded is too main stream.

Good thing some of us know how to change a few digits.

I wasn't trolling, here's another chop method: if (client.getInventory().getItemForName("Bronze Axe") != null) { selectInventoryOption(client.getInventory().getSlotForId("Bronze Axe", "Chop"); sleep(random(5000000000, 600000000); That's more efficient than the last one.

Why would you even need people to submit code for this, snippets are supposed to be at least something worth spending the time to make/have a solid function and don't take 5 seconds to create. public void chopTree(String s) { Entity tree = closestObjectForName(s); if (tree != null) { if (tree.isVisible()) { tree.interact("Chop down"); sleep(random(50000000000, 600000000);

Mem leak.

It's in the thread bud, second partition of code. Ohh wait, you want to create a folder to put the screenies in, not an existing folder? Something like: File screenies = new File("Screenshots"); screenies.mkdir(); Untested, should work in theory.

That's how most people would feel, but this has been the reputation downfall of unregulated SDN bot sites before, where 'trusted' Script Writers have released scripts that work fine, but after a few days/weeks they pushed malicious updates to the code in order to profit from it. Perhaps there could be a section for scripts that haven't been regulated yet, and that should be ran at your own risk.

Did you not read? It's still going to be hand regulated..

i only run 7 accounts, so not really a huge farm, but this WILL ruin osbot for my sole use. Not necessarily, depends on the decision the Script Writer makes, not everything will be instanced.

Script instancing, will help minimize gold farming/crashing of certain methods.

My children, the expert has spoken.

Lol, lookup the 'this' keyword...

If you're going to have to talk to the customer to give them the pastebin link, surely you just as well tell them 'In progress' or 'Haven't started'

It's out of your hands, really. Try taking it up with the Script Writer(s) in question, for if they had effective dynamic sleeping then you wouldn't be getting such issues.

I believe you'd use !this.client.getMyPlayer().isUnderAttack() as a condition for initiating combat.

Porn og raphy