Disputed member: http://osbot.org/forum/user/79531-die-ligomo/

 

Thread Link: none

 

Explanation: Lent him money (for free) to buy membership (was around 4.5M) , payed me back 3.8M, won't pay back the 0.7M that's left.

I know 700K isn't a big deal, it's more about the guy not respecting his word in a market-esque setting and therefore not being trustworthy.

 

Evidence:

 

Skype profile

 

 

Link between OSBot and Skype profile

 

 

Proof that it wasn't a paid loan

 

 

Proof that the transaction took place

 

 

Feedback from both the pin I bought for him and the thank you he left for the loan.

 

 

 

Proof that he refuses to pay back the rest

 

Edited June 3, 201411 yr by Botrepreneur

Could you please provide a screenshot of where that user stated their Skype name / where they added you from?

In the meantime, I've moved them to TWC & requested them to post here.

Could you please provide a screenshot of where that user stated their Skype name / where they added you from?

In the meantime, I've moved them to TWC & requested them to post here.

 

Updated the OP.

 

He added me because I needed to borrow an account for my script (I payed him for that).

 

 

A couple of days later he asked me for a loan.

 

FIrst of all it's not the just the 700k, botre I think you're a missing a point. I was advertising your fungus banner? for a cash rate agreed - does this not therefore decrease the price significantly? or would u like me to attach proof?

and I do believe the definition of being trust worth completely differentiates in meaning in your terminology. I'm just pissed and I said it out of rage because I lost 3 accounts today, yet I am disappointed by botre for hiding the fact that I advertised his banner under my name a few days back - Yet, I don't understand how this person then can be 'trustworthy' if he is hiding other additional evidence where he could cover the costs, therefore reducing the costs. I think you failed to understand the point that 'I'm pissed' annoyed, when one is significantly annoyed  also known as 'rage', this overtakes and whatever comes to mind is said - psychology - check this out if you don't believe me: http://www.amazon.com/Stress-Management-Simple-Techniques-Everyday-ebook/dp/B00JV3N2P2/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1401825867&sr=8-1& keywords=psychology+and+stress. It doesn't mean I won't pay you back - Relax.

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=168h1dx&s=8#.U44rUi98UXw, also this is what he said. and I don't understand why i've penalised? At no Point did I say 'Never' I just said atm - meaning at the moment - again failed to interpret the meaning. Please sort this it's beyond absurd

and I do believe the definition of being trust worth completely differentiates in meaning in your terminology. I'm just pissed and I said it out of rage because I lost 3 accounts today, yet I am disappointed by botre for hiding the fact that I advertised his banner under my name a few days back - Yet, I don't understand how this person then can be 'trustworthy' if he is hiding other additional evidence where he could cover the costs, therefore reducing the costs. I think you failed to understand the point that 'I'm pissed' annoyed, when one is significantly annoyed also known as 'rage', this overtakes and whatever comes to mind is said - psychology - check this out if you don't believe me: http://www.amazon.com/Stress-Management-Simple-Techniques-Everyday-ebook/dp/B00JV3N2P2/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1401825867&sr=8-1& keywords=psychology+and+stress. It doesn't mean I won't pay you back - Relax.

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=168h1dx&s=8#.U44rUi98UXw, also this is what he said. and I don't understand why i've penalised? At no Point did I say 'Never' I just said atm - meaning at the moment - again failed to interpret the meaning. Please sort this it's beyond absurd

Could you give us a date, in the near future, on which you will be able to pay him the 700k?

I'm not paying the full 700k. I advertised a banner under my signature which cuts off the gp. I'll pay the money once i've got an account sorted out and,  a 'TWC' removed - I haven't done anything wrong - like I have explained.....

 First of all it's not the just the 700k, botre I think you're a missing a point. I was advertising your fungus banner? for a cash rate agreed - does this not therefore decrease the price significantly? or would u like me to attach proof?

 

You didn't respect the duration of your term and therefore did not respect the TOS of that service and are not eligible for a payout. 

We agreed on 10 days, I think you only had the  ad in your signature for like 3 days.

I'm sorry, that service and this issue are in no way related, and even if they were then the accumulated payout would only have reduced your debt by something like 0.30$ which is like 100K.

 

 and I do believe the definition of being trust worth completely differentiates in meaning in your terminology. I'm just pissed and I said it out of rage because I lost 3 accounts today

 

 

Just a precaution man, no hard feelings.

I gave you a week to pay me back, we're two months later, sorry if i'm second-guessing your trustworthiness.

 

 

 http://tinypic.com/v...=8#.U44rUi98UXw, also this is what he said. and I don't understand why i've penalised? At no Point did I say 'Never' I just said atm - meaning at the moment - again failed to interpret the meaning. Please sort this it's beyond absurd

 

I told you you could pay me back whenever you could.

You then told me you weren't going to pay me back, that's what this thread is about, it's not about you not paying at tame (which you didn't, you are like 2 months late).

 

 

I'm not paying the full 700k. I advertised a banner under my signature which cuts off the gp. I'll pay the money once i've got an account sorted out and,  a 'TWC' removed - I haven't done anything wrong - like I have explained.....

 

Once it is refunded, TWC will be removed.

"how about 0.08/24h, I'll set the order at 10 days, if at the end of the order your post count is still bellow 50 the price is reduced to 0.06" this is exactly what you said on skype, you can confirm that. If you disagree i'll provide evidence no hard (just cba). We agreed to that rule, not at one point did botre say 'die ligomo you will paid after the 10 day duration', botre just  he just said that "how about 0.08/24h, I'll set the order at 10 days, if at the end of the order your post count is still bellow 50 the price is reduced to 0.06". In addition i'm not late all. You agreed buddy, not me. YOU Said I could pay you, your 700k 'whenever' - define whenever? I just said I won't pay you back 'atm' as you understand my situation on Runescape. I just said I don't have intentions of scaping at the moment, hence 'pissed'.

I'm not paying the full 700k. I advertised a banner under my signature which cuts off the gp. I'll pay the money once i've got an account sorted out and, a 'TWC' removed - I haven't done anything wrong - like I have explained.....

The TWC rank won't be removed during the time that this dispute is open. After the dispute has been resolved, I might consider removing it depending on the outcome.

you also said 'I think you're at 150k', and now you're saying 100k? we didn't agree to what rates (we didn't say no rates), what are you  trying to get at here?

now we've got two mod's debating over to whether they should remove it or not? Super mod: Mikasa said: 'once is refunded, TWC will be removed." and now Global mod Dex has said: "after the dispute has been resolved, I might consider removing it depending on the outcome." I don't like might, and I'm undecided overall... penalised over something like this? If someone should be penalised, I think it's equally fair to put TWC under botre aswell for hiding substantial evidence which could have reduced the price of the 700k, and that he even said I can pay him 'Whenever' or is the mods in favour of Botre?

After checking my database:

 

 

The user did serve a 10 day period, sorry for the confusion.

This was the initial deal.

 

However, we changed the agreement to a monthly one as he requested to be payed with a bond instead of $.

 

 

The service was started on the 17th of may and canceled the 30th.

13 days isn't a month and he did therefore not respect the final deal.

 

 

 you also said 'I think you're at 150k', and now you're saying 100k? we didn't agree to what rates (we didn't say no rates), what are you  trying to get at here?

 

 

You asked me for a bond like 3 days after the service started, you would have been eligible for payout after ~30 days.

That was me saying "sorry you aren't quite" there yet. 

Do you seriously think I am trying to scam you for 50K?

I'm just hating the fact, how bote fabricates some of these mis quoted sentences - ridiculous....

 I don't like might, and I'm undecided overall... penalised over something like this? If someone should be penalised, I think it's equally fair to put TWC under botre aswell for hiding substantial evidence which could have reduced the price of the 700k, and that he even said I can pay him 'Whenever' or is the mods in favour of Botre?

 

I don't owe you anything as you did not respect my TOS.

Even if you had respected the terms of our monthly deal then I'd still owe you nothing, YOUR debt would just have been smaller.

I gave you one week to pay me back initially, two months later and I still don't have all my money back, and now you are requesting for me to be put in TWC?

 

You got to be kidding me.