public static int[] WORLDS = {301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312,
	313, 314, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 333, 334,
	335, 336, 338, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 349, 350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 357,
	358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377,
	378};

And to hop to a random one:

new WorldHopper(MethodProvider).hopWorld(WORLDS[random(WORLDS.length)]);

Had to make this last night and might save someone a couple minutes

 

This list CONTAINS F2P worlds: 308, 316

This list DOES NOT CONTAIN PvP worlds: 325, 337

Edited January 1, 201412 yr by Swizzbeat

What is when random(WORLDS.length) = 0 is ? You subtract 1 then its -1. A array with -1 is impossible.

Don't subtract 1 then it will work.

Edited December 31, 201312 yr by Soldtodie

What is when random(WORLDS.length) = 0 is ? You subtract 1 then its -1. A array with -1 is impossible.

Don't subtract 1 then it will work.

The first index of an array is zero, however the length method returns the total number of items in the array not taking this into account.

The first index of an array is zero, however the length method returns the total number of items in the array not taking this into account.

 

He's actually right though, the random function's max is exclusive, so it already goes from 0 - max-1

You can test it.

		int test = -999;
		while((test = random(WORLDS.length)-1) != -1) {
			
		}
		log("It's " + test + " !");

He's actually right though, the random function's max is exclusive, so it already goes from 0 - max-1

Hmm I always thought the random method started at 1 my apologies then, I'll fix now. Thanks to both

You have to subtract by one, the length of an array with one object is 1, while the object index is 0. If the random method returns the length of this array it will give you a nullpointer as the object that has the index of the length doesnt exist (in short words: the lenght of an array is its total objects +1)

You have to subtract by one, the length of an array with one object is 1, while the object index is 0. If the random method returns the length of this array it will give you a nullpointer as the object that has the index of the length doesnt exist (in short words: the lenght of an array is its total objects +1)

Hmm so my original code was right I just need to add a min/max value in....I'll fix when I get on a computer!

Your code is too broad and it doesn't take into consideration potential latency issues someone may experience, e.g., I don't play on American servers because there would be too much latency at times. If I were to bot, this would undoubtedly effect the bot's performance.

Your code is too broad and it doesn't take into consideration potential latency issues someone may experience, e.g., I don't play on American servers because there would be too much latency at times. If I were to bot, this would undoubtedly effect the bot's performance.

This is just an array for all the possible worlds people can hop to without the PvP ones. I don't think anyone really cares if their on an American/Germany server :p

new WorldHopper(MethodProvider).hopWorld(WORLDS[random(WORLDS.length - 1)]);

No need to put the 0 in there. ^_^

new WorldHopper(MethodProvider).hopWorld(WORLDS[random(WORLDS.length - 1)]);

No need to put the 0 in there. ^_^

Fixed it right after I changed it :p it's 2 in the morning my brains a little loopy!

An instance of WorldHopper is already accessible from MethodProvider.

 

MethodProvider#worldHopper

Thanks for this

 

Alot of people might want to remove the f2p worlds, though

Sorry but this is not right:

random(WORLDS.length() - 1)

An example:

 

random(28);

This can gives you the number 0 or the number 27 and all numbers beetween this two numbers. But not the number 28.

 

This is right:

random(WORLDS.length())