I block all signatures for this reason specifically.

 

I have a girlfriend of 3 years as well.

 

if i could block avatars as well I would.

 

 

But the fact that the rule states it shouldn't be pornographic or imply it...

 

There is plenty pictures of girls squeezing their tits together and skirts flying up and shit...

 

If that's not pornographic then idk what is.

Tough rule to enforce, since very subjective.

Or we should just make a Mature (18+) section. 

If you don't want to see avatars either there are plugins that can probably do that. I think you're in the minority here. 

If you don't want to see avatars either there are plugins that can probably do that. I think you're in the minority here. 

 

 

If the rule is still "But the fact that the rule states it shouldn't be pornographic or imply it..."

 

Then it should be enforced....

 

 

Just because its a minority doesn't mean shit. 

Its a rule and should be followed.

 

Still doesn't make sense.

 

If you don't want to see avatars either there are plugins that can probably do that. I think you're in the minority here. 

 

 

If the rule is still "But the fact that the rule states it shouldn't be pornographic or imply it..."

 

Then it should be enforced....

 

 

Just because its a minority doesn't mean shit. 

Its a rule and should be followed.

 

Still doesn't make sense.

 

All of that is subjective though. If the mods don't think it's implied then you're SOL. If you don't want to see it, be proactive and don't look at it. 

Well it says you have to be "18" to join this... site so....... tbh the "rule" should be changed... i mean dont say "oh you can post porn" but i think as long as they have clothes on it's fine... 

andd yeah who doesnt like to see that (;

to cut it short, your g@y?

Edited November 24, 201312 yr by CantHackIt

lol this makes everyone guy in here against it sound extremely homosexual. why would you not want to see a great ass or nice pair of tits when scrolling down some forums about a video game? im sorry to tell you but if you actually step outside and talk to some girls thats what youre going to see.. not rs pixels. theres no d scim under that bra so get used to it i mean cmon

What I've gathered from the responses on this thread.

 

1. There is a lot of underage b& on here.

 

2. It seems no-one can read.

I think OP is a homosexual, that's why he doesn't like to see real goodness. 

 

OP is straight and engaged.

And I can bet his woman walked by a b*tched him out for an ass being on his monitor.

And furthermore,

 

Pornography: printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity

 

Straight off of google.

So your arguments are invalid, considering no sexual Organs or Activities[ex: sex] are being portrayed.

 

 

Good day, sirs.

 

I think OP is a homosexual, that's why he doesn't like to see real goodness. 

 

OP is straight and engaged.

And I can bet his woman walked by a b*tched him out for an ass being on his monitor.

And furthermore,

 

Pornography: printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity

 

Straight off of google.

So your arguments are invalid, considering no sexual Organs or Activities[ex: sex] are being portrayed.

 

 

Good day, sirs.

 

Why good day to you sir, I will just go ahead and prove every one of your stubborn arguments wrong.

You don't know for a fact that he is straight, just because he is engaged; I should of clarified that earlier, I believe he is a closet homosexual.

A quick fix would be to just disable that signature that they do not wish to see.

Furthermore, it's apparent that the simple minded such as yourself cannot dig deeper into the context of a definition to discover the true meaning.

Based on your Google-ripped definition, it would be valid to argue that breasts (organs) that are clothed fully but still are somewhat displayed can be considered pornography.

Also, pornography can be interpreted differently by different people, so you cannot say that Google is the only 100% true and correct answer, because it obviously is not.

 

This answer that I have given should clear up all questions and concerns pertaining to this topic, this thread can now be closed. 

Edited December 10, 201312 yr by Britney

>>Doesn't want to see naked fake sluts while browsing forums

>>Doesn't interest me, I like ladies not whores.

>>Makes thread about it

>>Get called gay.

 

Great job OSbot! You're reasoning and reading skills are obviously far more superior than mine considering 80% of you have gathered this "He must gay, because his definition of woman doesn't match mine of a slut."

 

Lol you're a fucking joke. 

Lol you're a fucking joke. 

 

Great job further proving my point.