Zur Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Hello, im not really used to this style of tag but gave it a go, CC appreciated. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xNeyaa Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Hello, im not really used to this style of tag but gave it a go, CC appreciated. looks awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hades Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Not bad, 7/10 ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrecks Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Damn, that is pretty cool, although I'm easily impressed by this stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan Posted October 11, 2013 Share Posted October 11, 2013 Amazing - should have put it in SOTW... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basic Posted October 11, 2013 Share Posted October 11, 2013 Hello, im not really used to this style of tag but gave it a go, CC appreciated. It isn't "amazing". The text placement is pretty good, you filled in the empty space, I just don't like how the render was placed. I also don't like the lens flares at the top, they're random as hell... The effects around the focal are well placed, I think this piece would look a lot better if it wasn't so... idk how to put it, faded maybe? We'll just say faded lol. Looks very low quality because of this, if it was bright and high quality I would have liked it. It's decent, but I wouldn't call it amazing :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan Posted October 11, 2013 Share Posted October 11, 2013 Hello, im not really used to this style of tag but gave it a go, CC appreciated. It isn't "amazing". The text placement is pretty good, you filled in the empty space, I just don't like how the render was placed. I also don't like the lens flares at the top, they're random as hell... The effects around the focal are well placed, I think this piece would look a lot better if it wasn't so... idk how to put it, faded maybe? We'll just say faded lol. Looks very low quality because of this, if it was bright and high quality I would have liked it. It's decent, but I wouldn't call it amazing I think the render was placed in a good place (refering to the rule of thirds). I think the clouded affect really adds to it as the render seems like it was originally cartoonist. However I can exactly see what you mean and I'd suggest he use it more selectively. Its a matter of opinion and I can see how different tastes would effect this. That said, you can tell he's very experienced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basic Posted October 11, 2013 Share Posted October 11, 2013 Hello, im not really used to this style of tag but gave it a go, CC appreciated. It isn't "amazing". The text placement is pretty good, you filled in the empty space, I just don't like how the render was placed. I also don't like the lens flares at the top, they're random as hell... The effects around the focal are well placed, I think this piece would look a lot better if it wasn't so... idk how to put it, faded maybe? We'll just say faded lol. Looks very low quality because of this, if it was bright and high quality I would have liked it. It's decent, but I wouldn't call it amazing I think the render was placed in a good place (refering to the rule of thirds). I think the clouded affect really adds to it as the render seems like it was originally cartoonist. However I can exactly see what you mean and I'd suggest he use it more selectively. Its a matter of opinion and I can see how different tastes would effect this. That said, you can tell he's very experienced. I wouldn't say very experienced either... You must not go to graphic sites then. <-- this artist is very experienced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan Posted October 11, 2013 Share Posted October 11, 2013 (edited) Hello, im not really used to this style of tag but gave it a go, CC appreciated. It isn't "amazing". The text placement is pretty good, you filled in the empty space, I just don't like how the render was placed. I also don't like the lens flares at the top, they're random as hell... The effects around the focal are well placed, I think this piece would look a lot better if it wasn't so... idk how to put it, faded maybe? We'll just say faded lol. Looks very low quality because of this, if it was bright and high quality I would have liked it. It's decent, but I wouldn't call it amazing I think the render was placed in a good place (refering to the rule of thirds). I think the clouded affect really adds to it as the render seems like it was originally cartoonist. However I can exactly see what you mean and I'd suggest he use it more selectively. Its a matter of opinion and I can see how different tastes would effect this. That said, you can tell he's very experienced. I wouldn't say very experienced either... You must not go to graphic sites then. <-- this artist is very experienced. Can't tell if you're being serious. Edit: I knew I had seen that before, I know that artist, he is experienced, however that tag isn't too attractive. Skill Edited October 12, 2013 by Jason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basic Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 Hello, im not really used to this style of tag but gave it a go, CC appreciated. It isn't "amazing". The text placement is pretty good, you filled in the empty space, I just don't like how the render was placed. I also don't like the lens flares at the top, they're random as hell... The effects around the focal are well placed, I think this piece would look a lot better if it wasn't so... idk how to put it, faded maybe? We'll just say faded lol. Looks very low quality because of this, if it was bright and high quality I would have liked it. It's decent, but I wouldn't call it amazing I think the render was placed in a good place (refering to the rule of thirds). I think the clouded affect really adds to it as the render seems like it was originally cartoonist. However I can exactly see what you mean and I'd suggest he use it more selectively. Its a matter of opinion and I can see how different tastes would effect this. That said, you can tell he's very experienced. I wouldn't say very experienced either... You must not go to graphic sites then. <-- this artist is very experienced. Can't tell if you're being serious. Of course i'm being serious. His work is amazing. Here is another great artist's work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 Hello, im not really used to this style of tag but gave it a go, CC appreciated. It isn't "amazing". The text placement is pretty good, you filled in the empty space, I just don't like how the render was placed. I also don't like the lens flares at the top, they're random as hell... The effects around the focal are well placed, I think this piece would look a lot better if it wasn't so... idk how to put it, faded maybe? We'll just say faded lol. Looks very low quality because of this, if it was bright and high quality I would have liked it. It's decent, but I wouldn't call it amazing I think the render was placed in a good place (refering to the rule of thirds). I think the clouded affect really adds to it as the render seems like it was originally cartoonist. However I can exactly see what you mean and I'd suggest he use it more selectively. Its a matter of opinion and I can see how different tastes would effect this. That said, you can tell he's very experienced. I wouldn't say very experienced either... You must not go to graphic sites then. <-- this artist is very experienced. Can't tell if you're being serious. Of course i'm being serious. His work is amazing. Here is another great artist's work Yeah I can agree that's beautiful holy crap that perfect lighting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basic Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 Hello, im not really used to this style of tag but gave it a go, CC appreciated. It isn't "amazing". The text placement is pretty good, you filled in the empty space, I just don't like how the render was placed. I also don't like the lens flares at the top, they're random as hell... The effects around the focal are well placed, I think this piece would look a lot better if it wasn't so... idk how to put it, faded maybe? We'll just say faded lol. Looks very low quality because of this, if it was bright and high quality I would have liked it. It's decent, but I wouldn't call it amazing I think the render was placed in a good place (refering to the rule of thirds). I think the clouded affect really adds to it as the render seems like it was originally cartoonist. However I can exactly see what you mean and I'd suggest he use it more selectively. Its a matter of opinion and I can see how different tastes would effect this. That said, you can tell he's very experienced. I wouldn't say very experienced either... You must not go to graphic sites then. <-- this artist is very experienced. Can't tell if you're being serious. Of course i'm being serious. His work is amazing. Here is another great artist's work Yeah I can agree that's beautiful holy crap that perfect lighting. He's very experienced, now can you tell the difference between zurioks tags and his? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graphic Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 6.5/10 Not my style though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zur Posted October 12, 2013 Author Share Posted October 12, 2013 Here's my opinion Like others said, seems to all around look low quality .. not very sharp. You need to use an HD image. Text is nice but not too annoying, background seems fitting and not too distracting. Good variety of effects to make the render be the true focal point. Seems the quality is allot more poor than anticipated. Agree with all your comments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anne Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 You have better work out there, also quality seems low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts