Excluding an Object from interaction.

[Zummy]

I want to mine only a certain set of rocks but I can't seem to exclude others, this is my pseudo code:

RS2Object rock1 = getObjects().closest(7454);

if (rock1.getGridX() != 10176){
	// mine rock
}

Is there a proper way instead of looking at the object's grid coordinates?

Thanks

Edited August 13, 2018 by Zummy

[Zummy]

Nevermind, I found the flaw. Apparently gridX can change?

Edited August 13, 2018 by Zummy

[Explv]

2 hours ago, Zummy said:

I want to mine only a certain set of rocks but I can't seem to exclude others, this is my pseudo code:

RS2Object rock1 = getObjects().closest(7454);

if (rock1.getGridX() != 10176){
	// mine rock
}

Is there a proper way instead of looking at the object's grid coordinates?

Thanks

1. Use colours instead of IDs for rocks:
 

2. Use an Area to filter the rocks, not gridX and gridY:
 

private static final Area ROCK_AREA = new Area(1, 2, 3, 4);

RS2Object tinRock = getObjects().closest(obj -> ROCK_AREA.contains(obj) && Rock.TIN.hasOre(obj));

Areas can be calculated using the OSBot entity hover setting, or using my map https://explv.github.io/

[Zummy]

1 hour ago, Explv said:

1. Use colours instead of IDs for rocks:

2. Use an Area to filter the rocks, not gridX and gridY:

Areas can be calculated using the OSBot entity hover setting, or using my map https://explv.github.io/

Thank you again! I really appreciate all the help, that map tool is absolutely great! I do get a warning tho on my getObjects().closest() code -> Unchecked generics array creation for varargs parameter.

[Explv]

10 minutes ago, Zummy said:

Thank you again! I really appreciate all the help, that map tool is absolutely great! I do get a warning tho on my getObjects().closest() code -> Unchecked generics array creation for varargs parameter.

You can ignore that warning

[Zummy]

7 minutes ago, Explv said:

You can ignore that warning

Cool, thanks again!