Yay or nay, that's all i need to know.

13 minutes ago, Polymorphism said:

Yay or nay, that's all i need to know.

If you're talking about MethodProvider.gRandom, then yes it does.

19 minutes ago, Explv said:

If you're talking about MethodProvider.gRandom, then yes it does.

 

I thought as much, just needed reassurance. Thank you sir<3

Edited March 26, 20178 yr by Polymorphism

Does gRandom works as expected for you guys? I just tested it, got unexpected result and posted a bug report but I'm kinda starting to doubt as it'd be weird that nobody would have noticed I suppose:

Using MethodProvider.gRandom(600, 200) which should be based on normal distribution I got the following result:

Also, the api says that the method caps the values, however I suspect that it returns all the values above the cap number as the cap number, instead of regenerating a new random. This makes the last (and first) number should up way higher than the rest

15 million results using gRandom(600, 200):

 

1 minute ago, Stimpack said:

15 million results using gRandom(600, 200):

 

Yeah this shows it much better. This isn't normal distribution but those capped values are really bad  mind if I use your image in the bug report I already posted? 

1 minute ago, Reveance said:

Yeah this shows it much better. This isn't normal distribution but those capped values are really bad  mind if I use your image in the bug report I already posted? 

yeah sure, do whatever u want with it. i'm sure there's a reason the values come out like that though. let's hear from @Alek

Adding methods like gRandom and moveMouseRandomly were a mistake. Explv answered your question.