Fringie

it's not an unlocked processor so you basically threw away 30% of it's performance already.

dafuq

8.1 in all things btw sorry French language xD 8.1 in all, o.O that's odd but nice regardless. Just so you know these ratings aren't the best, overclocking etc doesn't affect them (I oc'ed my CPU to 4.5 ghz [i've changed it since] same cpu score, and my ram to 2133mhz (the timings are good considering the OC) and my score never changed. I'm pretty sure mechanical drives have the same scoring as well (I have two seperate 1 tb WD HDD's one's the green edition and ones the black and they got the same score [i know this because the greens from my old desktop). If you want to check how good your PC is your better of using benchmarking software.

Click on the score so we can see what you got in each section. 8.1 is a fairly nice score, what parts are you using? SSD etc I'm assuming.

2050k/acc with tut island completed. skype @ fringie2

AMD aren't bad, no clue where your getting that opinion from. The A10 series is only good if your going to use it for your APU so I can already tell you know nothing. What? The 8350 beast of a card, not as good slightly worse than the i7 3770k (which was it's competitor) and it costs nearly half the price; how can you complain about that? Also, why is nvidia shitting themselves about AMD's official new card release next month code named hawaii? The last time AMD released high end cards was in 2011 and even to date the cards compare to some of the best consumer grade nvidea's (they also dominate the low end and business markets) imagine what their new series will be like. Leaked results (using early drivers, imagine when the drivers are finished) of one of the high end cards beat the titan and it costs $600. Expect nothing spectacular from AMD BUT expect them to wipe the floor with nvidea (their high end cards will be better than the nvidea cards and I'm sure AMD will continue to dominate other sections of the market)! If you seriously follow hardware you should know that AMDs new cards are really anticipated. The only let down AMD have done this year so far is with the 9000 series of cpu's. 8350 competes with 3570k... and falls behind most of the time. i do agree that amd's GPU's are great, though. But they certainly don't "wipe the floor" with nvidia. Look it up online, with practical applications the 8350 falls just behind a 3770k but when running benchmarks it's score is more comparable to a 3570k. I don't need to explain it when you can look up the facts. Wut.. the 7970 which was released in 2011 is 10% averaged out worse than the 770 while still costing less, nuff said? Their new series will defo wipe the floor with nvidea's current series. Their is a lot of reasons why theirs a huge hype over AMDs cards atm. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2049397/amd-unveils-hawaii-generation-of-gpus.html http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/167309-radeon-r9-290x-hardware-specs-and-benchmarks-of-amds-titan-killer-leaked

You can't buy help on mopar + lol at very knowledgeable people. @ op your not very descriptive (name a few tasks and payments). 1000s of 5 year olds post threads like this.

AMD aren't bad, no clue where your getting that opinion from. The A10 series is only good if your going to use it for your APU so I can already tell you know nothing. What? The 8350 beast of a card, not as good slightly worse than the i7 3770k (which was it's competitor) and it costs nearly half the price; how can you complain about that? Also, why is nvidia shitting themselves about AMD's official new card release next month code named hawaii? The last time AMD released high end cards was in 2011 and even to date the cards compare to some of the best consumer grade nvidea's (they also dominate the low end and business markets) imagine what their new series will be like. Leaked results (using early drivers, imagine when the drivers are finished) of one of the high end cards beat the titan and it costs $600. Expect nothing spectacular from AMD BUT expect them to wipe the floor with nvidea (their high end cards will be better than the nvidea cards and I'm sure AMD will continue to dominate other sections of the market)! If you seriously follow hardware you should know that AMDs new cards are really anticipated. The only let down AMD have done this year so far is with the 9000 series of cpu's.

680 thrashes the 760. PS AMD are good idk why bigm0ma dislikes them, maybe he bought a bad model.

$400/50 isn't a lot at all. Save up at least $600 or buy second hand parts but even their it'll be bad..

It goes, first ban, then perm ban. For major, not minor, and it is different case to case. Sorry about spam post but I am confirming this. One of my accounts has 3 botting related bans and it is still not perma'd. + I can prove it

Pm me the name and price. Must be RFT with use of a middleman unless you don't mind going first.

Just because he's is not a paying member doesn't mean he does not have a right to complain. Now let this be the end of that stupidity.

I read this and was thinking it'd be a charity lelelelelel. Members of this community never cease to amaze me.

It's your gpu.. the 3930k is one of the best consumer grade CPU's, it's in the top 5 extreme i7s.. So don't even start to think it's your hexa core extreme cpu. It's not the gpu, old school renders everything with the cpu, so a good gpu isn't even needed. That's why it is such a cpu intensive application (relative to the quality of game you are playing). Although it does seem weird that you can only get 10 bots...you can probably get alot more. You know they dont all have to be at 60+ fps for the bot to function right? It's not like you are controlling them manually so it doesnt really matter. When you start dropping down to like 1-2 fps, then that is a sign that there probably isnt enough memory/processing power being allocated to the program. Anyways, with the OP's cpu you could easily run like 20 bots, the main thing holding you back would be the amount of ram, not the cpu. But seriously just use low cpu mode. I'm clocking my laptop at 2ghz (so that it doesnt get to hot) and I can still run 10 bots at low cpu without even using 100% cpu. It uses around 3-4 gb of ram though, and if you don't have a memory cleaner it can start using 10-15% more I'm replying to this post out of manners but that is a dumb post.

Which Service i like the most: farming Why i like it?: farmings a bitch

It's your gpu.. the 3930k is one of the best consumer grade CPU's, it's in the top 5 extreme i7s.. So don't even start to think it's your hexa core extreme cpu.

I don't GDK and I never had but quite simply your limited to GSS. When you do web dev you can either Author it or use WYIWY (What you see is what you get) software instead, this is the exact situation but different context. You are limited to what functions GSS can offer you. There are no complex methods in GSS. http://redcloth.org/articles/wysi-dangerous-why-wysiwyg-editors-are-bad-for-your-website/ Many of the reasons why WYIWYG isn't a good idea for advanced authoring is the same as a GDK bot. Simply, GSS isn't advanced enough yet. You can't make real fail safes yet.

Their won't be any fail safes. I think you should reconsider releasing this but ofc it's up to you.

200kb/s.. Idk.. maybe.. It'll be laggy but you can probably bot one account?

When I read 32gb ram I cried and closed your thread.

Ty but nty, I can get $2.2 via (1k+ vouches on another forum) gift atm ty tho. It'll be sold within an hour most probably.

Hi, 07 1:10 rs3 Paypal $2.4/m (only if you have lot's of fb on this site or p****bot/sy**e My skype: Fringie2

You have a 3930k and your using a crappy gpu.. Omg, pls sell me your cpu plsss. $300 ;3. What a waste man..

You could just amazon usb 3.0 16gb/32gb and one will come up then look up the specs.. lazy..