Satire

I laughed so hard. I thought this guy came back on the show and actually talked about it. The sub fits perfectly with his actions and laughs. The best one yet.

Works fine for me too.

If you make an account with the same ip and bot it on that same ip, you don't get banned ( not with my tut island script). I was then able to use a normal free proxy and login to the account, it still isn't locked. I think if you just make the acc on the same ip and then bot it straight after, you don't seem to get banned. Like legit, I have only been banned twice using my creator and I was using Explv's tut island. When I don't use it and use a private tut island script, I don't get banned. Jagex are playing with us or we're just questioning ourselves too much. They probably made an upgrade to their bot detection algorithim, hence the more frequent bans.

The only reason why he's saying it's the automated creators is because this was not there before. /track/ was added recently, I don't know the exact time it was added but it's new (when I was making my creator, this wasn't there). However, the fact that my creator still works means this tracking is possibly for something else. The fact that I made another 5 accounts and all of them aren't banned means it's either the tut island scripts, people doing something wrong (who knows what) or the ip is *possibly* flagged.

Not true. 3 accounts I made 1 hour ago with my account creator aren't banned. Used the same ip to make them + complete them. I then switched to an ip on the other side of the world, they work just fine. I'm pretty sure it's just the amount of accounts you create in an IP. I used premium proxies too, so I'm not sure if that has to do with anything. The reason why I find it rather odd is because if they wanted to stop us from creating accounts, they'd be better off having a JS solver (like cloudflare) to prevent "browsers" that don't support JS (cough, cough most clients in programming languages). Then you'd have to manually have to solve the JS (like how cloudflare bypasses work). I'm going to make 7-8 accounts on that ip (With a fresh ip, you can make up to 7 or 8 accs before they block you). If they get banned, then it's got to do with the quantity you make on a single ip. Still going to test this out more. I'm going to embed a browser into my creator and see if it really makes a difference. It just doesn't seem like it would, if they wanted to prevent this from happening in the first place, they wouldn't of accepted a POST request that doesn't have the "tracker id".

My creator still creates accounts. If they really wanted to prevent "unauthorized browsers without JS" then they would've rejected the requests I make. Why do they let you create accounts and then ban them later on when you can prevent it from being created at all? Here are the calls it makes, i'd assume it's random each request. It does seem to track the account in some sort of way. However, we do not know what this truly does. They could've added this to track the amount of accounts being created per day, the amount of accounts made with Oldschool rs only. I can say that they did change something in their system but it still isn't perfect. Sure a lot of accounts get locked but at the end of the day, some accounts don't get locked #worth EDIT: Tracker is irrelevant. It's probs to see how m any accs are made per day. Made a fresh acc, tut island botted it and it's still alive. It also seems that they removed that questionnaire in the begging of tut island ( I never got it).

It's quite a confusing topic. I've made over 2k accounts on my home ip and I logged into them on a proxy. Some got locked and some didn't (I checked some of the fresh ones I made yesterday on my IP). This is completely random and we need to find out what triggers it. Seems like they haven't chain banned any of my accounts either. None of my accounts has been banned. My mule, pure and main still stand.

Bump

I was honestly too lazy at the time to do that. It had custom pathing for a lot of areas. I just used the webwalker from that specific area because I just wanted the script to run.

Yea. Happened to me with 1 account. You can work around it. Make an account with an ip in the same country. e.g Make an acc with a proxy from the US, then bot that acc in the US. However, seems like if I do tut island by hand, It doesn't get locked. It's kind of strange, wtf.

I've waited a long time for this My script always walks along that path on startup (if in lumby) and now I don't have to baby sit it walking along draynor.

@nosepicker Here's your lambda support. Thank Viking :P EDIT: Seems you've already seen it EDIT2: Good job @The Viking. I used this and it makes things so much better. Code is much cleaner now. I may use this in all my projects

Bump

You tryin' to represent something in binary?

That depends on what you want to do. C# - Great for GUI and normal applications. Can makes games too, memory management is dealt with the language itself C++- Great for making big projects, especially games. Most memory management is handled by the programmer(s) and only a little bit is managed by the language itself. Java- Good for making RS scripts but also good for Android apps (C# is too). Those are the main ones. Anything else is not really needed. Python is for a completely different purpose.

I tried this and my computer blew up. Wtf virus?

I accidentally edited out the post. This is just a quick one I wrote as I fked the other one over real bad Here's the problem. if (RangeSpot.contains(myPlayer())) { if (Skeleton != null && !myPlayer().isInteracting(Skeleton)) { if (Skeleton.getAnimation() != 5491) Skeleton.interact("Attack"); } else if (Skeleton == null && FarSkeleton != null) { log("Attacking far Skeletons...."); FarSkeleton.interact("Attack"); localWalker.walk(RangeSpot, true); sleep(random(1000,2000)); FarSkeleton.interact("Attack"); } } else if(!RangeSpot.contains(myPlayer())) { SafeSpot.interact(bot,"Walk here"); } Should be if (RangeSpot.contains(myPlayer())) { if (Skeleton != null && !myPlayer().isInteracting(Skeleton)) { if(Safespot.contains(myPlayer()){ if (Skeleton.getAnimation() != 5491) Skeleton.interact("Attack"); } } else if (Skeleton == null && FarSkeleton != null) { log("Attacking far Skeletons...."); FarSkeleton.interact("Attack"); localWalker.walk(RangeSpot, true); sleep(random(1000,2000)); FarSkeleton.interact("Attack"); } } else if(!RangeSpot.contains(myPlayer())) { if(!SafeSpot.contains(myPlayer()) SafeSpot.interact(bot,"Walk here"); } If this doesn't work then you'd need to tell just say if the players position != safespot position. Then walk there.

Na man. It's just another way to grab money off you.

Linear Algebra is the easiest math you can do.

What's the problem? Why's it broken.

17.6M. Buyer went down a few cents this week

Cheeky you. Trying to get people's gold farming methods.

Try: grandExchange.buyItem(id, itm, price, quantity) Instead of using getgrandexchange. It doesn't seem to screw up with me at all, is something wrong on your end? However, I did not try it with leather or hard leather. I just tested my script out and it buys what it needs. Does this happen only with leather or not? If it only happens with leather, then it's a bug with the API.

Give us an option to disable this. It's really god damn irritating.

bump (since there's no bump button anymore).