Jump to content

candyfreak

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

806 profile views

candyfreak's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/10)

0

Reputation

  1. A kind bug ?? i only see your other script. I tried a few other things to get world hopping to work with all the f2p worlds. Still having the problem similar to this bug posted in the past. http://osbot.org/forum/topic/83016-hopping-world-bugs/?hl=hoptof2pworld If you don't feel like reading that pretty much my script hover's over the world and never clicks it and the hoptof2pworld never returns anything (true or false) causing the script to stop doing anything. This happens randomly. Update: Seems like it may be just world 384 that it bugs on will continue testing, used hop instead of hoptof2pworld() and ignored world 384. Update: Didn't fix it Noticed it happens with worlds greater than 84.
  2. I'm assuming you mean by getting the widget scrolling etc. the painful way?
  3. So when i try to hop to a random f2p world with hopToF2PWorld() it seems to randomly get stuck on worlds >= 84 and just hover forever randomly. This is a more full snippet of what i'm doing. if(!this.sA.getInventory().isFull()) { this.sA.worlds.hopToF2PWorld(); } Is this because i'm not properly checking to ensure that the world switch rs2widget is up or something or is this a client problem??? I've gotten random world hopping to work in my own method by using a rng and using hop() but this still only works for the first 8ish f2p worlds. Update: Seems like it may be just world 384 that it bugs on will continue testing, used hop instead of hoptof2pworld() and ignored world 384. Update: Didn't fix it Noticed it happens with worlds greater than 84.
  4. Thanks, That's all that i needed, I figured that was the way to do it. Was just making sure their wasn't an easier way.
  5. What is the most reliable way to ensure that an action is completed before starting another one. I know their is sleep methods but is this truly the best way to ensure you give enough time for an event to happen before another one starts ? An example is perfectly fine as a answer to this question and if my question seems unclear just let me know. Thanks in advance.
×
×
  • Create New...