OSBot running at 96% CPU on a 4core VPS

[Okabe]

Unix bench results:

========================================================================
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
 
   System: sv1: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab108.5 -- #1 SMP Wed Jun 17 20:20:17 MSK 2015
   Machine: i686 (i386)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz (5319.8 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   08:37:22 up 14:24,  1 user,  load average: 0.02, 0.47, 1.37; runlevel 3
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Oct 22 2015 08:37:22 - 09:05:34
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
 
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       18970306.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2963.8 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2400.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        458038.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          159383.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        876943.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1368363.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 211858.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               6069.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2744.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    531.6 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1755937.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
 
System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   18970306.8   1625.6
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2963.8    538.9
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2400.5    558.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     458038.9   1156.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     159383.8    963.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     876943.0   1512.0
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1368363.0   1100.0
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     211858.1    529.6
Process Creation                                126.0       6069.1    481.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2744.4    647.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        531.6    886.1
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1755937.9   1170.6
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         856.2
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Oct 22 2015 09:05:34 - 09:37:33
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
 
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       23581924.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    10904.0 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               4419.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        416221.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          135223.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        834986.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1744851.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 276023.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              11535.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   4339.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    634.5 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1903998.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
 
System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   23581924.6   2020.7
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      10904.0   1982.5
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4419.4   1027.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     416221.2   1051.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     135223.6    817.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     834986.7   1439.6
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1744851.8   1402.6
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     276023.7    690.1
Process Creation                                126.0      11535.2    915.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       4339.3   1023.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        634.5   1057.6
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1903998.1   1269.3
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1164.2

[walterww]

96% is much too high for a server of that capacity. Devs?

Edited October 22, 2015 by walterww

[durpified]

I'm using 95% atm with only 3 bots on? I dont know what happend? yesterday it was a lot less

 

now using injection and only 30% wtf

Edited October 22, 2015 by durpified

[walterww]

Using OSbot premium has reduced the CPU usage by 20%, now running scripts at around 75% with one bot.

[Lemons]

Using OSbot premium has reduced the CPU usage by 20%, now running scripts at around 75% with one bot.

 

Do you mean premium scripts? If so this sounds like you were using a poorly designed script. The overhead of OSBot + runescape can be covered with 50% of my virtual 2GHz core (one single core) on Digital Ocean. My scripts add on 10-50% more depending on what they are doing. So its def not OSBot, prob just the scripts were very inefficient.

[walterww]

Do you mean premium scripts? If so this sounds like you were using a poorly designed script. The overhead of OSBot + runescape can be covered with 50% of my virtual 2GHz core (one single core) on Digital Ocean. My scripts add on 10-50% more depending on what they are doing. So its def not OSBot, prob just the scripts were very inefficient.

 

No, premium OSBot. The advert takes up about 20% of the VPS CPU power, I tested this for about 5 minutes on both free OSBot and premium OSBot. I still think there's something up with the client, but I'm planning to get premium soon so it should be fine. Just annoying I don't think I'll be able to use mirror mode because of high CPU usage.

 

Where can I file a report about the ad? Kinda ridiculous how much it power it uses up, then again, sales for premium are good overall.